Habla el superintendente de Subsidio destituido e inhabilitado por 12 años

0:01 At the WU, Colonel' s report with the Superintendent' s scoop today ' s report. Daniel Welcome. This is today' s Colonel report. The Superintendent of Family Allowance, Luis Guillermo Pérez, was dismissed from his post and disqualified for twelve years from performing public functions by the Attorney General' s Office. The Public Prosecutor' s Office points out in its decision that Luis Guillermo Pérez was guilty of two very serious offences. First, he did not know the list of eligible administrative directors to appoint persons who had not participated in the prior convocatorial legal summons that had been held in May of two thousand twenty - two, that is, in the government of President Iván Duke. According to the decision of first instance, Superintendent Pérez lowered the requirements to accommodate other persons, thereby violating the principles of equality, legality and morality. Second, the Attorney General' s Office says that Superintendent Luis Guillermo Pérez exceeded his functions by asking the family compensation funds for contributions to support an initiative by Monsignor Rubén Darío Jaramillo to help the population of good fortune. The Office of the Procurator points out that, regardless of the fine humanitarian and altruistic nature, the superintendent has no authority to ask the entities under his supervision for contributions other than those required by law. The dismissed Superintendent, for his part, points out that

1:33 the Attorney General' s Office has committed several irregularities. Dr Pérez states that the disciplinary proceedings against him were initiated without any complaint, but at the direct request of Attorney General Margarita Cabello Blanco. The dismissed superintendent also claims that, behind all these facts is the president of hoaxes, the guild that groups the compensation boxes together. This is attorney Adriana Guillén, wife of former Attorney General Edgardo Amaya. According to the version of the dismissed and disqualified official, Dr Guillén herself told her that she and her husband, the former Maya Prosecutor, were very close friends of Attorney General Margarita Cabello Blanco and other public prosecutor officials who have participated in her process. He also says that when his first lawyer, Gustavo Quintero, resigned in the middle of a hearing, Fernando Rodríguez, who had been Private Secretary Edgardo Maya when he was Attorney General, was appointed as a lawyer and office. She also claims that when she appealed to the prosecutor who was prosecuting him, the prosecutor Yolanda Reyes continued to act and the challenge was denied within the record two hours by the disciplinary chamber of the prosecutor ' s office. Last Friday, at five o' clock in the afternoon, the deadline for closing pleadings expired. However, yesterday at noon in just a day or a half skillful, the prosecutor' s office wrote and issued a judgment of one hundred and ten pages, dismissing it and disabling it.

3:06 So far we greet the dismissed superintendent of family allowance, Luis Guillermo Pérez. Good morning, Dr Pérez, very good morning, Daniel and first of all July that I am not suspended for corruption or sanctioned for corrupt. Corruption is elsewhere. Well, Dr Perez, let' s start over there for the reasons of your dismissal. The Attorney General says you had no legal power to change the list of eligible persons to management positions in the compensation boxes. Why he did it, look Daniel. It is not a legal occasion to establish a chosen list. That has never happened in the family allowance system in the government went Duque, already when he was leaving in a day before the President left set up a closed list under the budget that a public call. Never a public summons and the former and superintendent has more faculties than the prostitute than mine and the law things are undone. As it simply makes you, I opened the list of democratic objects so that many more people could apply for you and, indeed, seventy- six new people were linked in the possibility of being appointed directors or agents of intervertion of intervention boxes. Says the attorney general ' s office that you asked for money from the compensation boxes monitored and controlled

4:43 by you to help the population of bliss that money. You' re a lawyer and I' m not a lawyer, Doctor Perez, but I' ve always heard that individuals can do everything that the law doesn' t forbid them, and officials can only do what the law allows them to do. What a rule of your ability to ask for those contributions to the compensation boxes. Okay. I believe that the prosecutor does not know that we live in a social state under the rule of law. He does not know that article ninety- two of the Constitution states that all citizens of our country must defend human rights. He is not aware of article 22 of the Constitution, which states that all persons in this country, whether natural or legal, must claim peace as a right, but it is also a social obligation, that is, that any person must contribute to passion. For more reason he is a public official and with more reason and one is part of a government that is profusing the pasta, a colloi one can be foreign anywhere in the Colombian territory.

5:47 “ How not to obey the agonizing call” Lario Jaranero excused. He told me to help one hundred and thirty- thirty change this truce. Local government does not contribute to departmental government. Neither does the national come with his resources and I asked the funds voluntarily in solidarity those that could contribute with Mr Ruben Dario the money that never happened to go came directly to the social pastoral of good fortune, for how they can reproach him. Pro Recognize if you are a praiseworthy initiative and then say that this is among my public functions, for of course yes, as the system of your family study is going to be alien to the peace of the country, to respect for human rights in Colombia, because the population of good fortune is not also part of the family subsidy system through its workers. Well, Dr Perez, but you don' t find it clear that you couldn' t ask for any input, even for that noble cause, from the entities vindicated by you. I want to give you an example. Imagine that the Superintendent of Industry and Commerce calls the president of supermarkets successes, whose commercial activity watches over him to ask him for a talk to help poor children or peace. If I am the success, I have the right to think that the entity, the institution that controls my activity, is putting my hand in my pocket beyond my legal obligations. You don' t see it that way, not at all, and remember that when the family allowance system has been called upon to help solve tragedies like the

7:21 Armenian earthquake, such as the extremely severe floods in Putumayo, no superintendents were discerned there disciplinaryly because they called the boxes to show solidarity. So no. This really has no constitutional or legal basis. That reproaches the obligation of any person in Colombia to contribute to respect for human rights and peace. I insist on it, and with more reason, he is only a public official. So you can' t just pretend to establish a twelve- year inability to restore me the way you' re doing it, because, in solidarity with a call that asked me to Monsignor Rubén Darío? I insist on it distressing to help save life, we save in prison lives. A Mr Rubén Darío has thus declared it before the Attorney General' s Office. The directors of the boxes have all stated that they never felt compelled to contribute. Many even went to declare that they did not contribute because they had no resources to do so. The family allowance system was never affected because the resources for prosecutors of four percent were not used. Those who contributed did so through their wages or employers who also contribute to the family compensation funds. The system was never affected.

8:39 Quite the contrary, as several said among others. There is therefore a greater chance that there will be a company and if there are more companies, the system of family allowance will grow more, because more contributions will reach the compensation funds. Okay, but, Perez, let' s go now with the alleged irregularities in the disciplinary process. Against you, why do you say that this process cannot be initiated at the request of the Attorney General, Margarita Cabello Blanco. Yes, there is no complaint against me about any complaints from anyone, any officials of the Superintendency, or any citizens. This originated or petitioned by order of Margarita Cabello and in friendly relations, as Adriana Guillén told her, in front of officials of the Superintendency, of her family study and other people of her close friendship with daisy hair. What has bothered them, because it has bothered them that I arrived in the system to remember that this system does not belong to the directors of the boxes, it does not belong to political plans. It is a system of all working families in Colombia, which have an immense heritage that has grown over more than sixty- five years.

9:56 It bothered them that I asked more than 100, 000 jobs and workers who are in the decent low family compensation boxes and signed a pact with the Minister of Labour and with me the nine vision of two thousand twenty- two. It bothered them that I asked them to sign a pact for early childhood and adolescence, so that our children and young people in the long periods of vacation, could have cultural, playful, sporting, human and spiritual growth activities through the great resources that family compensation boxes have in those valley hours that are never used during the week in those recreation centers. When I' m demanding that through the school feeding program or the complementary school day, no child endure hunger, that bothers them, that bothers them. That' s why they work for me. This is all unusual. Daniel, when you started your problems with the box president, Dr Adriana Guitén, who is married to former attorney Edgardo Maya, why do you say that that influenced the decision on her with everything she always let me know from the outset about that friendship relationship she had with Margarita Cabello. She hinted that I had to bend my head and submit to what she wanted, because she managed the system as she wanted and you associate as she wanted and taking advantage of that relationship with her husband, Edgardo Maya and Margarita Cabello, ordered this persecution against me. How it is

11:28 possible that in a month they have practiced twenty- three testimonies, three or four per day, as if I had nothing else to do, as if my defense attorney had no other cases to attend And when my defense attorney trusted came to light to one testimony and asked for it to be postponed please, because he had been with his wife until five in the morning in a clinic, he does not postpone it and when he resigns he tells him that they want to stay the same five days and I had to revoke the power in solidarity so that he can go home. Or it' s not done. And I defend my rights, not so much because I am Luis Guillermo Pérez Casas, I defend my rights as a Colombian citizen, because this cannot be allowed to happen to anyone in the country. The supervisory body, such as the Attorney General' s Office, cannot be used and abused for personal or partisan purposes. You claim, Dr Perez, that you were put on the line of attorney and office when this resignation of your tenured attorney was filed.

12:31 The former private secretary of Attorney Eduardo Maya was given legal counsel. Yes, so I was named Fernando, Fernando Rodríguez Castro, who said that on a weekend, very laudable on his part, what a great interest in contributing to justice. One weekend he heard twenty- three testimonies. Over a weekend, more than a thousand leaflets were read and then a diligence came to guarantee my right to the defense, because yes, I congratulated him on that, but at the same time I asked him if it was true that he studied the file. He must have found a testimony under the gravity of the oath, which fairly established that Adriana Guillén, Edgardo Maya Villa sol and Margarita Cabello had decided this persecution against me and he, having been a private secretary and close friend, Edgardo Maya Villazón, could not, according to the lawyer' s statute, accept that defense of his own accord. Dr Pérez Uste has spoken of several records in the decision- making times of his process. Please briefly mention some of those times that you point to as a good record. First, the fact that when I have challenged the number one prosecutor, Dr Yolanda Reyes, the woman herself being challenged, Dr Reyes produces three cars in a few hours, three cars one to, indeed accept that the ex officio lawyer,

14:09 Fernando Sánchez Castro, could not be my lawyer. Secondly, in order to close the debate on evidence, although there was evidence in my favour for its practice or that they had already been decried, the law is very clear. The only one who can give up the evidence that has already been decreed is the adria party could not do so. And thirdly, I end up in ten days before the closing arguments are filed. My lawyer. Finally, I obtained MiguelÁngel del Río and MiguelÁngel del Río as a trusted proxy when they recognized his personality. It is two days before the deadline, the intimidating period, therefore, to submit the closing arguments and despite his request that it be suspended in order to be able to know the file, he was not given that opportunity. Then, in a record time too the lady does not accept Dr Yolanda Reyes does not accept the challenge raised. He sends him to the Deputy Attorney General of the Nation to resolve the challenge and also sends him to the disciplinary ward, a disciplinary ward is made up of three persons.

15:18 When a disciplinary chamber is established, what is the rules of procedure for the session? In two hours. The disciplinary ward denies the challenge. On Friday of the previous week, the ten- day deadline for filing qualifiers was completed. Present a tutelage this Monday against such arbitrariness and I warned Dr Yolanda Reyes to wait for the ruling of the constitutional judge before proceeding to sanction me. As an adverse ruling against me was rightly anticipated and he did not attend. I take it. It is possible that I have issued a ruling just as you have pointed out, day and a half in a hundred and ten - page car and additionally prolongs my suspension by another fifteen- page car for three more months, among other things. I was already under an obligation to return to my post in February of this year and it did not because the cause for which I was suspended had disappeared. Well, a thousand thanks to Luis Guillermo Pérez, superintendent of family allowance, dismissed and disqualified for twelve years.

16:32 A second distance, a guardianship action and a criminal complaint are pending. We' ll see what for all this. This was today' s Colonel report. Thank you very much.