En juicio a Diego Cadena, muestran confesión de lo que le ofreció al testigo Monsalve

0:00 In the WU the report of ColonelÁlvaro Uribe and one of his lawyers, Diego Cadena, Daniel, What brings the report Today, good morning, July. This is the Colonel report. During the trial of the self- styled attorney Diego Cadena, a recording appeared in which he confessed what he offered to the witness, Juan Guillermo Monzalve, in exchange for his retraction. Although it has been clear for some time from the recording of the watch that Cadena asked him for what he calls the ht document, the controversial visitor of Prisons has never been heard confessing in a loud voice what the witness offered him, in exchange for the retraction, to favor the former president, Alvaro Uribe. Here in Monsalve he has pointed out for years as the founder of the so- called metro block of the paramilitaries. One more detail, The diego chain confession took place during a conversation with me was intercepted. It all began in April of two thousand eighteen, when through a source, I had information about the visits that a strange lawyer had begun to make to him. We lost communication Daniel when he was saying it all started in a conversation. Yes, sir I told you July that it all started in April of two thousand eighteen, when through a source, I had information about the visits that a strange lawyer

1:30 had begun to make to him. To the witness Juan Guillermo Monsalve imprisoned in the prison La Picota de Bogotá. A few weeks later, I gained access to the entry books to the picota and found that since February of that year, a lawyer named Diego Cadena, better known as the handler of letters, recordings and agreed deliveries of drug traffickers, had begun to go to the picota to meet Monzalpe. Sometimes he registered as a visiting lawyer for the convicted man kidnapped in Que grardo Ce at that time in the same courtyard and others of Daniel himself. You were telling us that a source informed you of a lawyer visiting prisons. Yes, sir and well I got access to the entry lists and found that that lawyer was Diego Cadena. Sometimes he had been registered as a visitor to the condemned kidnapper Enrique Browno H at that time held in the same courtyard and others of Juan Guillermo Gonzalvo himself. For that reason he has already told me Cadena the nights of Friday 25 May of two thousand eighteen to flee his version for the purpose of writing a column with the serious details of the case. I almost always keep in my notebook a record of what responds to the interviewee in this little booklet. It shows that Cadena told me that night that she had offered Monzal a free legal process in her trial. Many months later, I learned that my communication with Cadena had been recorded by the TC of the Public Prosecutor' s Office, which, by orders of the

3:05 Supreme Court of Justice, had been investigating the possible crimes of my interlocutor in the calls ora observations of the analyst, that is, of the CT agent who hears and transcribes the interception. It also shows that Cadena admitted in the conversation with me the offer made to him by the witness and that in that case it can be considered a concussion. For years. I looked for the audio copy of that recording and I couldn' t find it. I had access to something more than 400 calls out of the thousands intercepted, but I never got to hear that one. I had already resigned myself to not listening to the conversation, which is conclusive evidence, when last week, at one of the trial hearings called Ganter, the prosecutor of the case exhibited several interceptions, among them. This one that you are going to flee took place on Friday 25 May from two thousand ten, at eight o' clock in the night, in ten minutes forty- one seconds, as recorded in the electronic register of the ct In order to understand the importance of what we are going to hear now, I am going to read to you an article of the Penal Code that states quotation marks whether for your benefit or for the benefit of a third party to give or promise money or other utility to a person who witnessed a criminal act to refrain from testifying or to miss the truth or the street wholly or partially commit to imprisonment from six to twelve years and fine from

4:35 fifty to two thousand legal minimum wages in force. So much for the quote from the Penal Code. In the conversation I ask chain with all the letters he offered the witness in exchange for the retraction and he tells it. Please listen to him and the gentleman called me. My wife' s not going to call and she' s going to hand over the court- based document. What did I tell you, Danis Look at that is a bank, I said head- on in the letter and addressing it to the honorable Supreme Court of itself and the one who was sorry for this family. Uribe, then, if you want that caste thing, if that was the life court, two things, if you want to ask for the apology, he will do it and ask the Court also the issue of your safety and the safety of your family, all over the table. I' ll give you a parenthesis. Also look Not obviously, it' s so stupid to go tell a gentleman at this point in life that you' re already a little bit accredited in the professional exercise for Iron Machin, an inchima a kind of and I tell you that without missing it regarding the sea. He' s a bandit to me, love of pulpier they found you in this proversion. One is very povile to. My name is Culton' s bandit and love.

5:49 It' s you. It can' t cost, it doesn' t peditate, it doesn' t confense in friendship in vain, it doesn' t have love of a whore. Then I read the gentleman in a conversation and tell him something. I believed him because of the rolling. He didn ' t even just set you up here from tactile companies. Look, we talk, we talk. He told me he was going to get hurt by the lack of complaint. I told you that' s right. I offered him an appeal for review before the Court. I told you I don' t know your case, but I could make you a review resource for my office to help you on the subject of your Count. Well, I diego chain. Not only did he offer legal proceedings to the witness Juan Guillermo Gonzalti, he also made representations to the prosecution to favor another witness, Carlos Enrique Vélez. To the latter he also sent several million pesos, diego chain and his lawyer and bankancino claim that these free legal proceedings were not for lying, but encouragement for witnesses to tell the truth about the payments. In cash, abeles indicate that they were humanitarian aid and travel to the prisoner. This was today' s Colonel report. Thank you very much.