May 17, 2024

Caso Álvaro Uribe: recursos jurídicos de su defensa lo acercan a la prescripción

Caso Álvaro Uribe: recursos jurídicos de su defensa lo acercan a la prescripción

La Fiscalía señala a Uribe como presunto determinador y no como coautor, como lo había hecho la Corte Suprema de Justicia. Lo cual podría dificultar la labor probatoria.

Spotify podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

La Fiscalía señala a Uribe como presunto determinador y no como coautor, como lo había hecho la Corte Suprema de Justicia. Lo cual podría dificultar la labor probatoria.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.920 --> 00:00:04.639
There' s a bonus track.
In a few minutes at eight in the

2
00:00:04.679 --> 00:00:09.919
morning before the judge forty- four
criminal in Bogotá circuit, Sandra Liliana Heredia

3
00:00:10.199 --> 00:00:18.000
Arana will begin the prosecution hearing against
former president Alvaro Uribe. The indictment initially

4
00:00:18.120 --> 00:00:23.000
filed by the prosecutor delegated to the
Supreme Court of Justice, Gilberto Villarreal,

5
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:30.239
Pablo Epava, is supremely loose.
He leaves out evidence of possible bribes from

6
00:00:30.280 --> 00:00:35.560
three inmates of the convita prison.
The maximum cost to Valencia is someone sinahi,

7
00:00:36.159 --> 00:00:40.200
Giovannik David and Mon José Mármol alias
the Polli. For the rest,

8
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:45.000
Uribe points out as an alleged determiner
and not as a co- author,

9
00:00:45.079 --> 00:00:49.320
as the Supreme Court of Justice had
done, which could hinder the trial work.

10
00:00:49.840 --> 00:00:54.960
Anyway, the indictment may end up
helping the former president, prosecutor Villarreal,

11
00:00:55.399 --> 00:00:59.679
who came to that position on behalf
of his fellow student. Gabriel Ramón

12
00:00:59.719 --> 00:01:03.719
Jaime He is Uribe' s questioned
prosecutor Defensor met in recent days with the

13
00:01:03.799 --> 00:01:10.560
victims' representatives and promised to review
and improve the indictment. Today it will

14
00:01:10.599 --> 00:01:14.480
be known if he really did.
The procedural order of the session provides that

15
00:01:14.519 --> 00:01:19.000
the hearing begins with a review of
jurisdiction and requests for annulment. It is

16
00:01:19.319 --> 00:01:23.959
possible that the defense of former President
Uribe again calls for the nullity of the

17
00:01:25.040 --> 00:01:30.400
telephone interpretations that have already been denied
by four judicial bodies. What is unusual

18
00:01:30.400 --> 00:01:34.319
is that the defense of former President
Uribe maintains that these recordings do not prove

19
00:01:34.719 --> 00:01:38.319
anything, but he continues to call
for their nullity. If they prove nothing,

20
00:01:38.359 --> 00:01:42.560
they must be annulled in the exercise
of such legal remedies. They bring

21
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:48.239
former President Uribe closer to the statute
of limitations. If, on the seventh

22
00:01:48.719 --> 00:01:53.079
of October, two thousand and twenty- five has not been resolved in second

23
00:01:53.159 --> 00:01:59.439
instance, the investigation and the trial
will expire and the case will end by

24
00:01:59.480 --> 00:02:01.280
statute of limitations of the criminal action. The hearing will begin in minutes.

25
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:05.079
This was today' s colonel report. Thank you very much.