April 14, 2024

¿Quién es, o quiénes son el pueblo?

¿Quién es, o quiénes son el pueblo?
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon

“El pueblo” es un concepto etéreo que es difícil de definir y por eso ha sido tan manoseado por los políticos. ¿Quiénes son El pueblo?, ¿El Pueblo siempre tiene la razón?

Para este capítulo hablamos con la periodista María Elvira Samper; con el Director del Grupo de Estudios de la Democracia de la Universidad del Rosario, Yann Basset; con el representante a la Cámara, David Racero; y con el senador Humberto de la Calle.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:06.919 --> 00:00:11.199
I' m Roberto Pombo. Welcome
to my questions, an average rush program

2
00:00:11.279 --> 00:00:21.000
sponsored by KFAM, family compensation box. The people are an ethereal concept that

3
00:00:21.079 --> 00:00:24.519
is difficult to define and that is
why the politicians have been so hands-

4
00:00:25.519 --> 00:00:29.879
on who the people are. The
people are always right for this chapter.

5
00:00:30.600 --> 00:00:35.240
We spoke with journalist María Elvira Samper, with the director of the Democracy Studies

6
00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:39.719
Group of the University of Rosario,
Jean Basset, with the House Representative,

7
00:00:39.880 --> 00:00:43.640
David Rasero, and with Senator Humberto
de la Calle, I am Roberto Pombo,

8
00:00:45.159 --> 00:00:52.159
and this is chapter eighty- three
of my questions welcome. Within the

9
00:00:52.200 --> 00:00:57.880
fundamental questions and questions of humanity is
the existence of God. For some it

10
00:00:57.920 --> 00:01:00.799
is not a possibility, but a
resounding fact. If you do not believe

11
00:01:00.840 --> 00:01:06.760
in God by mere exercise, suppose
for an instant that there is now what

12
00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:12.400
you believe God wants from us.
The interpretations and answers are multiple, not

13
00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:18.640
to say infinite. It depends on
which sacred book you read or even which

14
00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:22.200
verse or chapter you read. The
answer can change and is that, while

15
00:01:22.280 --> 00:01:26.400
there are some commandments, at least
in Christianity, their interpretations are several.

16
00:01:26.680 --> 00:01:30.319
But let' s go to the
Bible, let' s do the exercise

17
00:01:30.640 --> 00:01:34.480
of seeing what God wants, what
directions he gives. In most cases we

18
00:01:34.519 --> 00:01:38.560
read your instructions through someone else.
What the Book of Jeremiah says he told

19
00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:42.920
him, or what Abakuk says he
responded to him through a vision, or

20
00:01:44.040 --> 00:01:48.040
what Abdias says he told the people
of Edom that he had said to him

21
00:01:48.239 --> 00:01:53.799
and so let us think for a
moment about the Shabbat, the day when

22
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:57.040
God commands the human to rest and
sanctify him. The guide is not rest.

23
00:01:59.159 --> 00:02:02.760
The bat appears in the Bible and
the Torah. However, Catholics and

24
00:02:02.799 --> 00:02:08.479
Jews make a different interpretation of God' s indications. Or go to Islam.

25
00:02:08.800 --> 00:02:13.960
This religion has the Sharia, a
book that is based on the Koran

26
00:02:14.199 --> 00:02:17.360
and that is something like the moral
and legal framework of that religion. This

27
00:02:17.479 --> 00:02:22.439
book establishes a path for moral life, but not a set of laws,

28
00:02:22.759 --> 00:02:27.199
in particular, so its interpretation is
rather lax and has been the subject of

29
00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:31.960
debate for a long time. I
also have in mind the use of the

30
00:02:31.960 --> 00:02:37.159
word of God that has been made
to justify atrocities such as the hitmen who

31
00:02:37.199 --> 00:02:40.000
pray their bullets, or like the
Holy Inquisition, which perceived and tortured scientists

32
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:45.800
and prominent figures in the name of
faith and martyred the so- called witches.

33
00:02:46.960 --> 00:02:51.800
God' s word is rarely direct
and concrete. That is why the

34
00:02:51.919 --> 00:02:55.879
phrase a little exculpatory that says God' s ways are mysterious. However,

35
00:02:57.280 --> 00:03:00.759
God’ s word, despite its
lack of clarity, is deley in many

36
00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:05.879
cases. So there is an ancient
Latin expression that was coined centuries ago.

37
00:03:06.840 --> 00:03:09.479
Box Populi, Box Day. The
voice of the people is the voice of

38
00:03:09.960 --> 00:03:15.199
God to refer to a sacred command. On that basis political systems have grown

39
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:20.800
or at least democracies, the most
popular system or at least on paper in

40
00:03:20.840 --> 00:03:24.719
almost every country of the world,
as almost everyone learns in the College,

41
00:03:25.479 --> 00:03:31.000
that democracy is the power or regime
of the people. Let' s say

42
00:03:31.240 --> 00:03:35.680
it means people and crates, which
means power. I am not going to

43
00:03:35.759 --> 00:03:38.319
review what democracy is or how it
was born, but it has to be

44
00:03:38.400 --> 00:03:44.680
said that that people who participated in
democracy had some limits. It excluded women,

45
00:03:45.080 --> 00:03:47.840
foreigners, slaves, and was only
considered to be citizens, men over

46
00:03:47.879 --> 00:03:54.199
the age of twenty, children of
Athenian father and mother. Since then,

47
00:03:54.479 --> 00:04:00.120
this concept of people has been extended
until the people have listened to each other.

48
00:04:00.759 --> 00:04:04.960
All of us have the power as
soon as we are grouped together as

49
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:09.240
a group with similar characteristics. However, the concept remains vague or broad,

50
00:04:09.759 --> 00:04:15.399
as God’ s word has thought
to whom politicians and academics refer. When

51
00:04:15.439 --> 00:04:19.279
they refer to the people, it
comes to mind, for example, in

52
00:04:19.639 --> 00:04:24.360
the Gettinsburg speech, one of the
most important given by the American provocateur Abraham

53
00:04:24.439 --> 00:04:29.199
Lincoln, and which closes with the
phrase to Brocomillas and that the government of

54
00:04:29.279 --> 00:04:32.480
the people, by the people and
for the people will not disappear from the

55
00:04:32.519 --> 00:04:36.480
face of the earth. I'
m closing Comillas. In his famous narrow

56
00:04:36.480 --> 00:04:42.319
speech, Simon Bolivar repeats the village
about thirty- four times. But don

57
00:04:42.439 --> 00:04:45.879
' t go that far. The
Charter of the United Nations begins with its

58
00:04:45.959 --> 00:04:50.480
preamble, as we the peoples of
the United Nations say. And, if

59
00:04:50.560 --> 00:04:55.879
we look at a more local case, just beginning our political constitution, the

60
00:04:55.959 --> 00:05:01.720
one of the ninety- one article
three tells Borocomillas resides exclusively in the people

61
00:05:01.800 --> 00:05:05.680
from which public power emanates. The
people exercise it directly or through their representatives

62
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:11.560
in accordance with the terms established by
the Constitution. I' m closing Comillas.

63
00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:15.759
This is perhaps the most open and
most used word in politics, always

64
00:05:15.120 --> 00:05:20.680
spoken with a certain mysticism and solemnity, but perhaps the most iconic phrase that

65
00:05:20.720 --> 00:05:26.240
best captures what has become the concept
of the people. It was told by

66
00:05:26.319 --> 00:05:33.000
the murdered liberal politician Jorge Liez.
The gaitan personally leaves there' s a

67
00:05:33.199 --> 00:05:36.560
bologna that sticks to me, because
it' s still like this. The

68
00:05:36.759 --> 00:05:46.519
randa, the gift. The interpretations
of the phrase are several, especially if

69
00:05:46.560 --> 00:05:51.480
we stick to representative democracy, because
a country is headed by a congressional politician

70
00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:57.800
mayor governor or president to lead on
his behalf, because he sees reflected in

71
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:02.839
that person his will. So,
if the leaders and politicians represent the people

72
00:06:02.879 --> 00:06:06.920
and their will, the decisions made
by a politician in the name of his

73
00:06:08.079 --> 00:06:12.319
votes are justified. I looked for
Senator Humberto from the street to help me

74
00:06:12.360 --> 00:06:16.560
answer these questions, and this he
told me at the beginning. Democracy was

75
00:06:16.639 --> 00:06:21.560
direct democracy. The Greeks gathered in
the agora and there we made the decisions.

76
00:06:21.600 --> 00:06:26.240
But since that became impossible, things
became more complex, more difficult.

77
00:06:28.079 --> 00:06:33.879
Representative democracy is emerging. Then the
people intervene through some representatives. Now the

78
00:06:34.000 --> 00:06:42.000
validity of that representation is not questioned
in what we call liberal democracies. There

79
00:06:42.120 --> 00:06:48.800
are basically two systems on the value
or mandatory or non- binding nature of

80
00:06:48.800 --> 00:06:55.720
people' s decisions. In some
countries, the representative, that is,

81
00:06:55.839 --> 00:07:00.319
the congressman, has to obey the
directives of his voters. In other places

82
00:07:00.399 --> 00:07:04.079
it is said that the congressman seeks
the common good, but he is the

83
00:07:04.160 --> 00:07:08.519
one who judges that it is the
common good and makes his decisions freely.

84
00:07:08.879 --> 00:07:12.920
But in any case, within democracies, what Congress decides, as a representative

85
00:07:12.920 --> 00:07:17.920
legitimately chosen by the people, is
the voice of the people and is therefore

86
00:07:18.000 --> 00:07:26.399
obligatory. The Italian researcher Giovanni Sartori
has already asked similar questions and has developed

87
00:07:26.399 --> 00:07:30.519
the topic of the important question,
Who are we or are the people.

88
00:07:31.600 --> 00:07:38.519
For these arthor has six possible interpretations. The first is the people as literally

89
00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:43.600
everyone. The second is an approximate
plurality, i e a majority. The

90
00:07:43.720 --> 00:07:46.759
third is that of the people as
a populace, that is, the lower

91
00:07:46.839 --> 00:07:51.839
classes or the proletariat. The fourth
is an organic and indivisible whole, the

92
00:07:51.959 --> 00:07:58.040
fifth is the people as an absolute
majority and the sixth is as a moderate

93
00:07:58.040 --> 00:08:03.480
majority. The question depends on who
is asked, especially when it comes to

94
00:08:03.560 --> 00:08:09.040
politicians, as I said before,
since many countries live in democracy and it

95
00:08:09.079 --> 00:08:13.199
is the people who choose their rulers. Many leaders and choose to believe that

96
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:18.279
then the people are the people who
elected them their voters, who make up

97
00:08:18.319 --> 00:08:22.480
that people have changed, because those
who voted before were men over twenty-

98
00:08:24.319 --> 00:08:28.199
one years old with properties and married
and the group opened up to enslaved people,

99
00:08:28.720 --> 00:08:33.039
illiterate and scarce resources, like women, until today, when except non

100
00:08:33.240 --> 00:08:39.879
- nationalized foreigners, minors, internees
or military, all can vote. This

101
00:08:39.960 --> 00:08:46.679
group of people is what economist Joseph
Chupiter considered the people, those who have

102
00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:52.159
the right to vote and who de
facto rule. However, you like me

103
00:08:52.200 --> 00:08:56.559
will have asked the same question.
Do people who cannot vote as minors,

104
00:08:56.960 --> 00:09:01.600
the security forces or those held in
prisons do not belong to the people?

105
00:09:03.840 --> 00:09:07.000
Well, in this case there is
another principle, nationality. So the people

106
00:09:07.039 --> 00:09:11.879
are the same as a nation and
its boundaries and borders are the same.

107
00:09:13.039 --> 00:09:16.639
The people share the same national identity
and, in this case, of all

108
00:09:16.679 --> 00:09:24.399
Colombians born nationalized, we are part
of that famous people. So far it

109
00:09:24.440 --> 00:09:28.120
seems that there is a clear and
concrete answer to the question and then the

110
00:09:28.159 --> 00:09:31.600
rest of this chapter can be replaced
with musical programming. The people are all

111
00:09:31.679 --> 00:09:37.360
Colombians or the inhabitants of each nation. But I wish everything was so simple

112
00:09:37.399 --> 00:09:41.080
in politics, even in democracies,
the people change according to the interests of

113
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:45.559
whoever has the power, and I
can think of several examples of this.

114
00:09:46.840 --> 00:09:50.600
We go to the year two thousand
sixteen. Donald Trump, in a campaign

115
00:09:50.639 --> 00:09:54.799
speech for his re- election,
told Urocomillas the only important thing is the

116
00:09:54.840 --> 00:10:00.799
unification of the people, because the
others mean nothing. I close quotes to

117
00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:05.279
who was referring to Trump with those
extras, the answer is simple. Those

118
00:10:05.320 --> 00:10:09.519
who did not vote for him,
undocumented immigrants and African- Americans. Then,

119
00:10:09.799 --> 00:10:13.919
as opposed to the people, to
the demos, a new side is

120
00:10:15.080 --> 00:10:18.360
created, a shadow within the same
nation, we, the people, against

121
00:10:18.360 --> 00:10:22.759
you. And that' s not
something new at all. Creating another is

122
00:10:22.960 --> 00:10:28.960
also part of creating an identity one
of us. Ah and his rival in

123
00:10:28.000 --> 00:10:31.840
the campaign didn' t fall behind. Democrat candidate Girary Clinton made some rather

124
00:10:31.960 --> 00:10:37.399
subligate statements about Trump' s followers
saying they could get half of them into

125
00:10:37.480 --> 00:10:46.120
a pitiful basket. Sping Grouse Lee
Jean robertsteck I was heff of Trumps of

126
00:10:46.159 --> 00:10:52.960
forters Cent wharrack of basketf the Parable. This is best explained by the Spanish

127
00:10:52.039 --> 00:10:56.440
writer and essayist Jesús Ferrero, in
his text, when he says that people

128
00:10:56.559 --> 00:11:03.600
tend to exclude and are part of
his subject. The peoples imaginaryally create different

129
00:11:03.679 --> 00:11:07.679
degrees of humanity and history is full
of cases that reaffirm what Ferrero says.

130
00:11:07.799 --> 00:11:11.480
Just look at the horror of the
Nazi holocaust or the South African paradise.

131
00:11:11.799 --> 00:11:18.000
But I am referring to these two
particular cases, because we are talking about

132
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:22.559
Germans against Germans and South Africans against
South Africans, that is, citizens of

133
00:11:22.639 --> 00:11:24.320
the same country against themselves. In
other words, the people against the people.

134
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:31.200
Usually, these others are the opposite
of the people, to the real

135
00:11:31.360 --> 00:11:35.440
people and here we begin to talk
about a well- known word popurism.

136
00:11:37.600 --> 00:11:41.879
The German polytoelo Jean Werner Müller explains
this in an article to Urocomillas. What

137
00:11:41.919 --> 00:11:46.519
really distinguishes the populist is an affirmation
that he and he alone represent the real

138
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:52.480
people. As Trump explained, as
the executive now controls, the people control

139
00:11:52.519 --> 00:11:56.679
the government by implication all illegitimate oppositions
and if you oppose Trump, you oppose

140
00:11:56.759 --> 00:12:01.480
the people. I' m closing
Comillas. Something similar happened several years ago,

141
00:12:01.720 --> 00:12:05.960
in a thousand nine hundred and ninety- eight, when the then presidential

142
00:12:05.960 --> 00:12:11.720
candidate of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez,
began his campaign with the proposal of a

143
00:12:11.720 --> 00:12:20.679
constituent national assembly, with the slogan
with Chávez commands the people chabes I am

144
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:26.080
no longer a chaver is a people
tucked in with the tunic of popular support

145
00:12:26.080 --> 00:12:30.480
is dangerous. We have already seen
it in all political trends. In fact,

146
00:12:30.840 --> 00:12:35.879
the slogan of the last presidential campaign
of the far- right Jair Bolsonaro

147
00:12:35.879 --> 00:12:39.279
was Captain Dupovo, who translates captain
of the village. The music of his

148
00:12:39.360 --> 00:12:43.240
campaign seems to be that of one
of the North Korean leaders, songs in

149
00:12:43.360 --> 00:12:48.320
which, among other things, they
say that he is of God and that

150
00:12:48.360 --> 00:12:52.679
there was never anyone like him.
On this there is a rather interesting academic

151
00:12:52.679 --> 00:12:56.039
work, entitled we the people who
analyze who the people are. According to

152
00:12:56.080 --> 00:13:01.399
the Twitter account of the former Brazilian
president. One of the authors' analyses

153
00:13:01.480 --> 00:13:05.519
is that the people appear as an
idealized, pure category vilified by the aristocracy

154
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:11.720
in its most basic rights. It
is the populist' s duty to restore

155
00:13:11.720 --> 00:13:15.919
those rights to the people. But
its power can only be conceived in democratic

156
00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:20.320
regimes, in principle by the will
of that very people. And so it

157
00:13:20.480 --> 00:13:24.480
is considered that there are three main
elements at the heart of populism, the

158
00:13:24.480 --> 00:13:28.960
people, the elite or elites and
the popular will. And, therefore,

159
00:13:28.240 --> 00:13:33.240
populism requires that the people it claims
to represent be recognized in it and place

160
00:13:33.600 --> 00:13:39.639
their trust and vows in it.
And that conviction implies, through communication,

161
00:13:39.759 --> 00:13:43.519
that this movement is established with what
identifies as the true people or the common

162
00:13:43.600 --> 00:13:48.279
people, that is, the citizenry
composed of the excluded, the oppressed and

163
00:13:48.279 --> 00:13:54.399
the forgotten. However, the tendency
to own the total representation of the people

164
00:13:54.480 --> 00:14:00.960
ends up generating more division than unity
over these or ns. A recent column

165
00:14:01.320 --> 00:14:05.200
by writer Juan Esteban Constantin, in
which he wonders who is the dream of

166
00:14:05.320 --> 00:14:09.320
that popular force, who defines it
and answers it himself. What is difficult

167
00:14:09.440 --> 00:14:15.200
to say to Brocomillas, because fascism
also consists in that, in that a

168
00:14:15.320 --> 00:14:18.720
movement is attributed to the brave the
power to point out from its ideas and

169
00:14:18.759 --> 00:14:24.440
prejudices, what are the scope of
the concept of the people and who are

170
00:14:24.559 --> 00:14:28.200
excluded from it, which is a
political and moral contradiction, because the essence

171
00:14:28.360 --> 00:14:31.519
of the people, its premise is
that we are all there. Cierro Comillas

172
00:14:33.039 --> 00:14:37.039
I moved to journalist Mara Forgets Samper
the question how the concept of people has

173
00:14:37.120 --> 00:14:45.320
served populisms. This told me the
term village is an ambiguous, complex,

174
00:14:45.960 --> 00:14:48.799
equivocal and multivo term, with at
the same time and also, controversial term

175
00:14:50.039 --> 00:14:52.720
to land here in the region.
I believe that the concept of people is

176
00:14:52.840 --> 00:14:56.720
key to populism, especially for the
left populism that conceives it, not as

177
00:14:56.960 --> 00:15:03.159
our Constitution does in its third article, which includes us all, but as

178
00:15:03.240 --> 00:15:07.799
the whole of the excluded, of
the marginalized, of those who suffer the

179
00:15:07.919 --> 00:15:13.879
abuse of corrupt elites. It should
now be said that populist discourse is in

180
00:15:13.919 --> 00:15:18.639
some way rooted in the limitations or
shortcomings of democracy and thus makes the people

181
00:15:18.759 --> 00:15:24.240
a strategic, political and social actor, a homogeneous identity. Even if it

182
00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:28.240
isn' t. I believe that
in that sense, the people is a

183
00:15:28.320 --> 00:15:33.159
functional construction to that binary discourse that
divides society into two, into oppressed people

184
00:15:33.240 --> 00:15:37.440
and into the oppressive or slave ligarchy
to say it in the terms of President

185
00:15:37.559 --> 00:15:43.720
Gustavo pt The people then are not
a homogeneous unity with shared identity, they

186
00:15:43.759 --> 00:15:48.600
are heterogeneous and changing and so I
believe that no one can appropriate their representation,

187
00:15:48.840 --> 00:15:54.200
which is what the populist leader does
that right there, ignores institutional restrictions,

188
00:15:54.159 --> 00:16:00.799
which is the gateway to authoritarianism and
many times to dictation. The people

189
00:16:00.080 --> 00:16:06.200
serve the populist leader to manipulate and
instrumentalize, but also to exclude and ignore

190
00:16:06.320 --> 00:16:14.399
institutions and evade mechanisms of reblessing accounts. So the term people is functional to

191
00:16:14.720 --> 00:16:18.200
many ideologies and to many leaders,
either from left to right, but especially

192
00:16:18.360 --> 00:16:22.000
to those on the left, as
we have seen in Latin America. And

193
00:16:22.159 --> 00:16:26.240
for more examples, because there is
Correa, there is Chávez, there is

194
00:16:26.240 --> 00:16:30.519
Maduro, Calula, it is evo. Morales. In short, examples about

195
00:16:32.200 --> 00:16:37.399
the beginning of the program mentioned the
famous vox saying Populi vox Day, which

196
00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:41.240
translates the voice of the people is
the voice of God in many ways that

197
00:16:41.240 --> 00:16:45.360
the people, at least understanding it
as the winning majority, are absolutely right.

198
00:16:45.679 --> 00:16:49.240
It' s not that simple or
that good. The first example is

199
00:16:49.320 --> 00:16:53.679
that the Ochile son says it shows
that, according to respondents, the rights

200
00:16:53.759 --> 00:16:59.000
of the vast majority of the population
should be prioritized over the rights of criminals.

201
00:17:00.679 --> 00:17:04.880
Twenty- seven percent of respondents believe
that in order to stop a necessary

202
00:17:06.000 --> 00:17:10.599
criminal from going over some of his
human rights, and forty percent think that

203
00:17:10.759 --> 00:17:15.440
the government should worry more about the
human rights of Chileans than about immigrants.

204
00:17:17.640 --> 00:17:21.359
The same measurement showed that, although
it is clear that the majority of Chileans

205
00:17:21.359 --> 00:17:25.680
are committed to democracy in certain crises, sixty percent of respondents mention that authoritarianism

206
00:17:25.759 --> 00:17:30.680
is justified in one of the following
circumstances, human rights violations, increased corruption

207
00:17:30.680 --> 00:17:38.759
in compliance with laws or uncontrolled crime, and the data continue. According to

208
00:17:38.839 --> 00:17:44.200
the World Barometer of Open Society Foundations, forty- two percent of the under

209
00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:48.240
- sixs worldwide believe that the best
political regime is a military dictatorship and thirty

210
00:17:48.759 --> 00:17:52.680
- five percent would prefer to live
in a pro- authoritarian civilian regime,

211
00:17:52.880 --> 00:17:59.599
without division of powers or an effective
parliamentary system. In Colombia, thirty-

212
00:18:00.119 --> 00:18:03.720
nine percent of those interviewed said they
prefer to be governed by a leader who

213
00:18:03.759 --> 00:18:10.160
dispenses with parliamentary elections. According to
the Latin study Barómetro two thousand twenty-

214
00:18:10.720 --> 00:18:14.960
three, thirty- three percent of
Mexicans think that an authoritarian government can be

215
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:18.839
preferable to a democratic one. And
in local terms, the issue is serious.

216
00:18:19.000 --> 00:18:22.880
In Colombia, eighty percent of the
population is dissatisfied with the democracy that

217
00:18:22.920 --> 00:18:26.359
is being managed and support for this
type of government is only forty- eight

218
00:18:26.440 --> 00:18:33.640
percent and many leaders seem to be
aware of those wishes. A few months

219
00:18:33.640 --> 00:18:37.359
ago, Juanita Gebertus, director for
America at Human Ride Watch, in an

220
00:18:37.519 --> 00:18:42.640
interview with the German media Doichevelle said
that there is a loss of confidence in

221
00:18:42.920 --> 00:18:48.799
democracy, of a crowding of many
leaders who are willing to transgress the separation

222
00:18:48.960 --> 00:18:52.480
of powers and continue to erode the
rule of law. There are some cases

223
00:18:52.559 --> 00:18:56.079
in which the most authoritarian governments enjoy
great popular support, as is the case

224
00:18:56.359 --> 00:19:00.680
with the Salvador and the prisoner'
s government in Ti Bukelli, which has

225
00:19:00.960 --> 00:19:03.920
solved the one that was a serious
security problem, that the detriment of the

226
00:19:04.000 --> 00:19:08.599
human and civil rights of many citizens
of that country. Like the arbitrary detention

227
00:19:08.839 --> 00:19:14.440
of thousands of people. According to
a May report last year by the NGO

228
00:19:14.519 --> 00:19:18.279
Cristo Sal Since the beginning of the
state of emergency, at least one hundred

229
00:19:18.359 --> 00:19:23.319
and sixty pesos have died bau state
custody. But these allegations and many more

230
00:19:23.400 --> 00:19:27.960
human rights organizations do not affect Buckeli' s popularity. According to the study

231
00:19:29.079 --> 00:19:33.720
by Latino Barómetro already cited, the
Salvadoran President is the Latin American president with

232
00:19:33.799 --> 00:19:38.400
the highest approval. I am not
going to refer to other cases of authoritarian

233
00:19:38.440 --> 00:19:41.880
governments today, such as those of
Ortega in Nicaragua or Maduro in Venezuela,

234
00:19:42.279 --> 00:19:47.039
because they, contrary to bukele,
enjoy little popularity. In the case of

235
00:19:47.119 --> 00:19:51.079
Nicaragua, according to a Galoub poll
last year, seventy percent of citizens believe

236
00:19:51.119 --> 00:19:55.400
that the country is heading the wrong
way and in Venezuela, according to a

237
00:19:55.400 --> 00:19:59.559
poll by Delphi and the Center for
Political Studies and Go Government of the Catholic

238
00:19:59.559 --> 00:20:03.119
University Andrés Bello, eighty- five
percent of the country wants a change.

239
00:20:06.400 --> 00:20:10.920
The world is full of terrible governments
for many reasons, with very low popularity

240
00:20:10.960 --> 00:20:15.160
and vice versa, of good governments
that fail to seduce the people. For

241
00:20:15.279 --> 00:20:21.200
some that democracy is always right is
like saying that the client is always right.

242
00:20:22.640 --> 00:20:26.160
For example, for Aristotle, the
fatal problem of democracy is that it

243
00:20:26.279 --> 00:20:29.880
divides society by confronting the majority,
even if it is not far superior to

244
00:20:29.920 --> 00:20:34.519
the minority. Seven years ago,
Julián Bagini' s Ph D wrote about

245
00:20:34.720 --> 00:20:38.839
this in an article in t de
guardan a urocomillas. Western democracy is built

246
00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:44.319
around tripartite trust, trust in the
people to hold the Government accountable and set

247
00:20:44.400 --> 00:20:48.519
the overall direction of politics, but
also trust in politicians to make specific decisions

248
00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:56.759
than institutions, to provide safeguards for
hasty or tyrannical contractions. What we are

249
00:20:57.039 --> 00:21:02.759
seeing throughout the Western world is that
the last two pillars are being torn down,

250
00:21:03.039 --> 00:21:07.400
leaving all confidence, resting on the
people I close quotes. According to

251
00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:11.720
Bagini, democracy has been useful to
us, because it is not democracy as

252
00:21:11.799 --> 00:21:15.960
it conceived the ancient Greeks. For
him, what we call democracy is actually

253
00:21:17.000 --> 00:21:23.960
a representative system of government that leaves
most important decisions to elected leaders. At

254
00:21:25.039 --> 00:21:27.759
this point he cannot stop thinking if
again in the referendum for peace canuel.

255
00:21:30.480 --> 00:21:33.559
However, in my view, it
was not the right decision, even though

256
00:21:33.759 --> 00:21:37.759
the majority wanted it to be.
Finally, that is what democracy is all

257
00:21:37.759 --> 00:21:41.519
about, to believe, to respect
the voice of the people. At this

258
00:21:41.599 --> 00:21:48.279
point I wonder then the people are
always right. I conveyed the concern to

259
00:21:48.359 --> 00:21:52.839
the director of the democracy study group
at the University of Rosario, Professor Jan

260
00:21:52.960 --> 00:21:59.039
Bassette. Well, democracy is a
regime based on the primacy of pop sovereignty,

261
00:21:59.240 --> 00:22:03.720
which does not exactly mean that the
people are always right. In fact,

262
00:22:04.160 --> 00:22:11.359
it does not make much sense to
put it this way, but it

263
00:22:11.440 --> 00:22:15.039
does mean that all government actions in
a democracy must be justified according to the

264
00:22:15.119 --> 00:22:19.559
will of the people, their interests, their needs. What happens is that

265
00:22:19.640 --> 00:22:25.720
we do not have an absolutely accurate
method of determining once and for all what

266
00:22:25.799 --> 00:22:30.519
this will of the people is and, in fact, we have a debate

267
00:22:30.519 --> 00:22:34.640
of never, never end up in
a democracy about really what the will of

268
00:22:34.680 --> 00:22:38.519
the people is, what their needs
are, and even a debate about what

269
00:22:38.640 --> 00:22:42.279
exactly the people are, if it
is the whole world, if it is

270
00:22:42.759 --> 00:22:47.720
the majority, if it is the
popular sectors for that people, if it

271
00:22:47.759 --> 00:22:49.960
is the national ones, unlike the
foreign ones, etcetera, etcetera. So,

272
00:22:51.079 --> 00:22:57.000
this truly indefinable character of the people
makes democracy pluralist and, in reality,

273
00:22:57.400 --> 00:23:03.000
a sort of competing Henry various ideas
about what the people want and what

274
00:23:03.039 --> 00:23:11.400
the people need. The President Petru
on many occasions has not resisted the caudilloist

275
00:23:11.440 --> 00:23:18.079
temptation to feel the anointed of the
people. He has repeatedly called on the

276
00:23:18.119 --> 00:23:22.319
grassroots, his voters to demonstrate to
support the reforms he promised and which,

277
00:23:22.519 --> 00:23:25.839
as he says, are the mandate
given to him by the people to govern.

278
00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:32.160
He has repeated several times that the
approximately eleven million people who voted for

279
00:23:32.279 --> 00:23:36.640
him in the second round are the
people and those who do not support him

280
00:23:36.720 --> 00:23:41.759
are the oligarchy or simply the right. Adrián Restrepo is a PhD in social

281
00:23:41.759 --> 00:23:45.240
sciences and a professor at the Institute
of Political Studies of the University of Antioquia

282
00:23:45.279 --> 00:23:49.440
and writes a text that asks which
people the President refers to and, among

283
00:23:49.759 --> 00:23:53.799
other things, tells Burou Comillas the
leader, the President, has to define

284
00:23:53.799 --> 00:24:00.440
the adversary or even the enemy of
the people, the angpueblo. For this

285
00:24:00.759 --> 00:24:06.519
he uses broad denominations such as the
orinarchy, the dominant groups, the establishment

286
00:24:06.599 --> 00:24:10.599
and others that allow the leader to
shelter with them those whom he considers to

287
00:24:10.599 --> 00:24:14.119
be opponents. Likewise, the leader, the President, must define the adversary

288
00:24:14.160 --> 00:24:18.440
or even the enemy of the people. Cierro Comillas, the people that the

289
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:22.039
President constantly invokes are the poor and
the excluded from the country. However,

290
00:24:22.400 --> 00:24:26.880
to believe that all poor studies in
the country support it is as much reductionist

291
00:24:27.000 --> 00:24:30.880
as to think that all people with
money or more affluent classes. They'

292
00:24:32.079 --> 00:24:36.079
re conservative right- wingers. Let' s nail that town of yours that

293
00:24:36.079 --> 00:24:40.039
he claims to represent. President Petro
referred to a few weeks ago when he

294
00:24:40.079 --> 00:24:45.640
launched a balloon on a possible constituent
Colombia. You don' t have to

295
00:24:45.640 --> 00:24:52.680
kneel. The popular triumph of two
thousand two is respected and the constituent National

296
00:24:52.839 --> 00:25:00.400
Assembly must transform the institutions. The
popular vote that President Petro is constantly talking

297
00:25:00.559 --> 00:25:04.720
about and with which he always counts
are those more than eleven million that we

298
00:25:04.759 --> 00:25:10.519
have mentioned on other occasions. He
has argued, for example, what aurocomillas.

299
00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:12.720
That is why the Constitution of the
ninety- one, made by a

300
00:25:12.839 --> 00:25:17.680
constituent in its first article, says
that the source of Sovereignty is the people

301
00:25:18.000 --> 00:25:21.160
and that is why the stanza of
the national anthem we sing every day.

302
00:25:21.319 --> 00:25:26.599
He says that it is the people
of the sovereign Cerro Comillas and also recently

303
00:25:26.680 --> 00:25:32.160
the OAS published a statement requesting respect
for the President' s mandate and said

304
00:25:32.440 --> 00:25:37.119
in its account of x auro Comillas
what sectors outside the Supreme Court of Justice

305
00:25:37.440 --> 00:25:41.319
and linked to drug trafficking and corruption
have explicitly attempted is not to allow the

306
00:25:41.400 --> 00:25:45.200
mandate that the people granted by popular
vote. So citizenship has every right to

307
00:25:45.240 --> 00:25:52.839
organize itself democratically and peacefully. I
close Comillas and, of course, in

308
00:25:52.920 --> 00:25:56.119
this case, the President is absolutely
right. However, it does not cease

309
00:25:56.160 --> 00:26:00.759
to cause my concern who is the
people referred to by President Petrú after the

310
00:26:00.839 --> 00:26:04.799
question to the House Representative, David
Rasero, and this told me the people

311
00:26:04.880 --> 00:26:14.759
category has three fundamental elements. The
first most important has to do with the

312
00:26:14.960 --> 00:26:21.920
self- awareness of those who differ
politically from the small group that has held

313
00:26:22.000 --> 00:26:26.519
political and economic power. What Gaitan
in the past spoke of liberal and conservative

314
00:26:26.559 --> 00:26:32.480
oligarchy, but Ligarchy and the people
were built with the notion of being the

315
00:26:32.599 --> 00:26:37.279
opposites of that ligarchy. Today that
idea is taken up again people are those

316
00:26:37.319 --> 00:26:42.000
who are different from those who have
always kidnapped the State. The second vision

317
00:26:42.240 --> 00:26:48.839
has to do with oneness from the
plural. It is a singular plural is

318
00:26:48.960 --> 00:26:55.160
the unified mass from diversity peoples.
They are the great majorities that unite from

319
00:26:55.279 --> 00:26:59.680
their differences in function of a cause, in function precisely against getting into the

320
00:26:59.720 --> 00:27:03.559
league. It' s a crowd. And third, it has to do

321
00:27:03.680 --> 00:27:07.720
with capacity and agency. The people
are only people while they are able to

322
00:27:07.839 --> 00:27:12.920
move, to mobilize, to act. If it is a people that does

323
00:27:14.039 --> 00:27:19.079
not move, that does not act, it is completely meaningless. I'

324
00:27:19.240 --> 00:27:22.720
ll conclude with an obviousness. There
is no consensus on who or who the

325
00:27:22.799 --> 00:27:29.000
people are. The answer will change
depending on who you ask. The people

326
00:27:29.160 --> 00:27:33.119
are all Colombians, the people are
those who support the government in turn,

327
00:27:33.480 --> 00:27:37.119
the people are those who have rights, or the people are certain classes,

328
00:27:37.599 --> 00:27:41.160
the proletariat or the most enlightened.
But there is one conclusion that we can

329
00:27:41.279 --> 00:27:45.000
come to, and that is that, like the word of God, the

330
00:27:45.359 --> 00:27:49.240
people' s concert has been handled
by all for their convenience. I'

331
00:27:49.319 --> 00:27:53.680
ll take that town. We are
totus, the Colombians and the politicians who

332
00:27:53.720 --> 00:27:59.680
represent us have the task of working
for all, without distinction from political parties

333
00:27:59.720 --> 00:28:03.680
or thought. I am Roberto Pombo
and this was chapter eighty- three of

334
00:28:03.759 --> 00:28:10.160
my questions. See you in the
next chapter from now on. This chapter

335
00:28:10.240 --> 00:28:17.000
of my questions is available on all
podcast platforms. This episode was made possible

336
00:28:17.079 --> 00:28:22.240
by Kafan. Family compensation box.
Dirección Roberto Pombo, Producción General Juan Abel

337
00:28:22.319 --> 00:28:27.519
Gutiérrez, editorial advisor, Daniel San
Pedro Espina, scripts juan Abel Gutiérrez and

338
00:28:27.599 --> 00:28:34.519
Johnny Rodríguez. Field production Marcela Salazar
and Lucía Beltrán audio postproduction Carlos Bernar