July 21, 2024

¿Debe ser pública la vida íntima de los mandatarios?

¿Debe ser pública la vida íntima de los mandatarios?
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player icon

Uno de los bemoles de ser una persona con poder (como un presidente) es que la línea que separa su vida privada de su vida pública es cada vez más difusa. ¿Los detalles de la vida amorosa e íntima de los presidentes deben ser públicos?, ¿puede un líder político ser ético en público y no en privado?

Para este capítulo hablamos con los periodistas Ángela Patricia Janiot, María Elvira Samper, Daniel Coronell, Ana Cristina Restrepo, Yolanda Ruiz y Daniel Samper Ospina.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:06.919 --> 00:00:13.320
I am Roberto Pombo welcome to my
questions an average rush program sponsored by KFAM,

2
00:00:13.759 --> 00:00:21.600
family compensation box. One of the
bemolls of being a person with power

3
00:00:21.719 --> 00:00:25.839
as a president is that the line
that separates his private life from his public

4
00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:30.800
life is becoming more and more diffuse. The details of the Presidents' loving

5
00:00:31.000 --> 00:00:36.960
and intimate life must be public.
A political leader can be ethical in public

6
00:00:37.439 --> 00:00:42.280
and not in private. For this
chapter we spoke with journalists Angela Patricia Janiott,

7
00:00:42.359 --> 00:00:46.439
María Elvira sanper Daniel Coronel, Ana, Cristina Restrepo, Lloranda Ruiz and

8
00:00:46.479 --> 00:00:52.119
Daniel Sanperrospina. I am Roberto Pombe
and this is chapter ninety- seven of

9
00:00:52.159 --> 00:00:57.359
my questions welcome. I' m
going to start this chapter with a confession.

10
00:00:57.719 --> 00:01:00.679
I' m a romantic man who
believes in love. This feeling I

11
00:01:00.759 --> 00:01:06.239
mean love is perhaps the one that
has motivated stories the most. Most great

12
00:01:06.239 --> 00:01:10.840
works of art have to do with
impossible loves, toxic loves, difficult loves,

13
00:01:11.079 --> 00:01:15.560
failed romances. In short, and
many of these great stories of love

14
00:01:15.799 --> 00:01:19.560
have transcended centuries and even millennia,
such as Robó and Juliet, the story

15
00:01:19.879 --> 00:01:25.079
of an impossible love that created an
archetype in itself, or the story of

16
00:01:25.239 --> 00:01:29.159
power, violence and love between Dalina
and Samson, in which the woman betrays

17
00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:33.200
the strongest man in the world who
is in love with her, revealing the

18
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:38.879
secret of her superhuman strength. And
perhaps my favorite Colombian novel of this kind

19
00:01:40.280 --> 00:01:44.280
is the love in times of García
Márquez' s anger, a magnificent story

20
00:01:44.560 --> 00:01:49.920
about the resistance of love. Over
time, only people in love could write

21
00:01:49.959 --> 00:01:56.480
these stories. In short, it
would take hours to view all the novels,

22
00:01:56.599 --> 00:02:00.840
stories and stories that have been written
on this subject. Real life has

23
00:02:00.200 --> 00:02:05.719
also given us great love stories,
although here I must confess that those who

24
00:02:05.760 --> 00:02:09.400
mix with power are my favorite.
For example, the first one that comes

25
00:02:09.520 --> 00:02:15.319
to mind is a story that mixes
two great characters like Cleopatra and Julius Caesar,

26
00:02:15.680 --> 00:02:19.439
in a relationship that still gives much
to speak to historians, or that

27
00:02:19.439 --> 00:02:23.400
of Napoleon Bonaparte, one of the
most important military and politicians in history,

28
00:02:23.199 --> 00:02:28.360
who fell in love with Josefina de
Bornet, a lady of French high society,

29
00:02:28.479 --> 00:02:31.759
and her relationship was full of infidelities
due to Napoleon' s long absences,

30
00:02:32.319 --> 00:02:38.479
but her relationship ended because she could
not conceive reiter. I' d

31
00:02:38.680 --> 00:02:44.840
have to spend hours reciting the number
of stories around love. But in my

32
00:02:44.919 --> 00:02:49.479
personal capacity, one of the ones
that has interested me the most is the

33
00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:53.360
one that supposedly existed between the President
of the United States, John Fischer and

34
00:02:53.400 --> 00:02:55.479
Kennedy, and the actress and model
Marilyn Monroe. Of this reliable information,

35
00:02:55.960 --> 00:03:00.400
but rumors have been that Monroe has
an affair not only with President Kennedy,

36
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:07.919
but with his brother, Attorney General
Robert Kennedy. These rumors were fueled in

37
00:03:07.960 --> 00:03:13.439
part by the sensual happy birthday performance
for President Kennedy of the celebration of his

38
00:03:13.680 --> 00:03:16.960
forty- five birthday at the Mison
Square Garden on 19 May of one thousand

39
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:22.280
nine hundred and sixty- two months
before the death of Hollywood' s son

40
00:03:22.360 --> 00:03:53.759
hed Re. Tales of biographers escorts
and key masters suggest that Monroe' s

41
00:03:53.800 --> 00:03:59.080
alleged suicide is related to the care
of keeping the secret of r n r

42
00:03:59.159 --> 00:04:02.159
r N or of the President of
the United States. Let the world know

43
00:04:02.199 --> 00:04:06.719
that John F. Kennedy was an
adulterous person, he would have had serious

44
00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:11.759
political repercussions. As we already know, all the protagonists of this story ended

45
00:04:11.800 --> 00:04:16.680
tragically. The intimate life of people
with power, like presidents, is a

46
00:04:16.800 --> 00:04:21.839
subject that causes morbidness and curiosity.
Maybe that' s why there' s

47
00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:27.319
always so much care and suspicion about
them. This is the case that is

48
00:04:27.439 --> 00:04:30.360
the most common and controversial, that
of the former president of the United States,

49
00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:34.160
Bill Clinton and the former White House
practitioner, Monica le Whinskys, in

50
00:04:34.720 --> 00:04:39.240
case she doesn' t remember it
or is very young, never found out.

51
00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:44.000
In a thousand nine hundred and ninety- eight, a scandal broke out

52
00:04:44.160 --> 00:04:47.800
in which then President Clinton had an
affair with the twenty- two- year

53
00:04:48.600 --> 00:04:54.600
- old practitioner Monica le WINSKIY in
August of that year, President Clinton agreed

54
00:04:54.959 --> 00:04:57.800
to have an inappropriate physical relationship with
Lewinsky. The West Not of Pro IRA

55
00:04:57.920 --> 00:05:02.879
' s Sociel Wood Nestownscrit program,
the West Rold Coutts Personal fact, Faler

56
00:05:03.839 --> 00:05:12.680
ol Myport for wit iamy the PLATE
the RESPONDSB. However, in January of

57
00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:15.519
that same year, the President had
refused to have relations with her, whom

58
00:05:15.839 --> 00:05:23.800
he asked to lie about Ader Not
Health Sexual, I have wsonso of Romans

59
00:05:23.920 --> 00:05:30.839
lowanskiy ah nevir Town BND bats or
an hour santle T in Neville was because

60
00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:34.920
of this lie that President Clinton became
the second President in the history of the

61
00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:40.319
United States to be called to a
political trial, although he was then turned

62
00:05:40.319 --> 00:05:44.399
over and only had to pay$
90, 000 for giving false testimony.

63
00:05:45.519 --> 00:05:48.480
The cases in which the love,
sexual or intimate life of the Presidents becomes

64
00:05:48.519 --> 00:05:54.360
news have been several in the world. Just to mention a few are the

65
00:05:54.600 --> 00:05:58.759
cases of the former President of France, Nicolas Sarcosin, and what began as

66
00:05:58.920 --> 00:06:02.319
an affair with Carla Bruni' s
singer, when she had recently divorced his

67
00:06:02.360 --> 00:06:08.680
wife for eleven years. But before
that was Francois Holande, who came to

68
00:06:08.759 --> 00:06:13.920
the presidency as a couple of the
journalist Valerie Triballe, with whom she ended

69
00:06:14.040 --> 00:06:17.040
up admitting that she had a thread
with actress Juli Galle. At this time,

70
00:06:17.160 --> 00:06:20.759
the French press jumped on the news
and the fact was very visible and

71
00:06:20.800 --> 00:06:26.079
commented For several weeks. The public
was flooded by media coverage from all angles

72
00:06:26.279 --> 00:06:31.199
and Holland' s approval rate was
affected by this scandal. As several polls

73
00:06:31.279 --> 00:06:36.839
showed. The list of leaders involved
in gossip and living and loving is long.

74
00:06:38.279 --> 00:06:43.240
Only the Presidents of France, who
have maintained individual romances make up more

75
00:06:43.319 --> 00:06:46.160
than half. Maybe that' s
why they call their capital the City of

76
00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:50.560
Love. But beyond gossip and gossip
magazines, these rarely transcend, among other

77
00:06:50.639 --> 00:06:56.120
things, because for the French private
life is much more sacred than it is,

78
00:06:56.519 --> 00:06:59.600
for example, for public figures and
in the other United States, In

79
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:06.319
what cases the romantic life of a
president is relevant to public opinion. He

80
00:07:06.439 --> 00:07:10.839
transferred the question to the journalist and
Joranda Ruiz, and this answered me.

81
00:07:12.439 --> 00:07:15.120
The right to privacy of public figures, particularly those in senior positions of the

82
00:07:15.199 --> 00:07:19.519
State, is not a full right
and has restrictions. In fact, this

83
00:07:19.560 --> 00:07:25.040
is reflected in several of the codes
of ethics of many media outlets around the

84
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:29.240
world. Now it is not written
in stone, in terms of journalistic ethics,

85
00:07:29.519 --> 00:07:31.600
in which case matters of that private
life can be aired or not.

86
00:07:31.759 --> 00:07:34.959
There are differences, for example,
between what happens in a private venue or

87
00:07:35.000 --> 00:07:39.839
in a public space, but it
always depends on the situation, the context

88
00:07:39.839 --> 00:07:43.720
and, above all, the possible
public consequences of the private episode. Affective

89
00:07:43.800 --> 00:07:47.680
relations belong in principle to the private
sphere, but if they can have an

90
00:07:48.000 --> 00:07:50.639
impact on security, on the use
of public money, on the fulfilment of

91
00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:56.680
the duties of the public character,
they cease to be exclusively private matter and

92
00:07:56.759 --> 00:08:00.639
may become part of matters of general
or collective interest. On the other hand,

93
00:08:00.839 --> 00:08:03.439
we cannot forget that, although it
was long considered that the public and

94
00:08:03.519 --> 00:08:09.519
private spheres could not be crossed and
there was a kind of permanent veil on

95
00:08:09.560 --> 00:08:13.639
the considered personal matters, since today
it is clear that the way couples,

96
00:08:13.240 --> 00:08:16.480
family relationships or care work are handled, to mention some private matters, because

97
00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:22.839
today this is part of important debates
on, for example, gender roles and

98
00:08:22.839 --> 00:08:28.120
the challenges that society must face.
That is why every detail of the matter

99
00:08:28.160 --> 00:08:33.000
must always be looked at with magnifying
glass to understand when other private individuals can

100
00:08:33.039 --> 00:08:35.919
transcend and become facts that go beyond
the personal, this when speaking, of

101
00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:41.240
course, of persons who occupy high
positions in the State. A few weeks

102
00:08:41.559 --> 00:08:46.440
ago a video appeared on social networks
in which President Gustavo Pedro was supposedly seen

103
00:08:46.559 --> 00:08:50.919
walking hand in hand with a woman
in the historic center of Panama, during

104
00:08:50.919 --> 00:08:58.120
an official visit by the President.
The controversy was served. However, only

105
00:08:58.559 --> 00:09:03.240
some media took the issue as news. It was the same President Petro,

106
00:09:03.679 --> 00:09:07.879
who referred to the subject and in
his x account published a message in which

107
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:11.279
he neither confirmed nor denied that it
was he who appeared in the video.

108
00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:18.039
The President asked for respect for his
privacy. He rejected the transphobic messages that

109
00:09:18.120 --> 00:09:20.879
came at the root of the rumor
that the woman with whom he allegedly appeared

110
00:09:20.960 --> 00:09:26.919
in the video was a trans woman
The President said Auro Comillas. I have

111
00:09:26.000 --> 00:09:31.000
always considered intimacy to be the ultimate
reason for freedom, the last trench of

112
00:09:31.120 --> 00:09:35.639
being free, and I will retain
this principle until I write of myself or

113
00:09:35.720 --> 00:09:41.799
die for those thousands of transphobic messages
that have exploded in the hands of a

114
00:09:41.799 --> 00:09:46.559
deeply exclusionary, ignorant and discriminatory right- wing society, must be rejected by

115
00:09:46.559 --> 00:09:50.679
the President. Every progressive knows that
human beings are equal and that the struggle

116
00:09:50.720 --> 00:09:54.759
for such equality involves physical and mental
emancipation and, therefore, no one who

117
00:09:56.200 --> 00:10:00.519
considers himself human can generalize the trans
in weak minds, slavery and discrimination.

118
00:10:03.639 --> 00:10:07.480
That action does not express animality,
but brutality. That' s why they

119
00:10:07.519 --> 00:10:11.320
kill the different and for millions.
That' s why they existed and there

120
00:10:11.320 --> 00:10:15.320
are Nazis. I am straight,
but you will never hear or read from

121
00:10:15.679 --> 00:10:18.919
me a transphoic word, because I
would not just stop being a man,

122
00:10:18.919 --> 00:10:22.120
but a human. I' m
closing Jomillas. The subject didn' t

123
00:10:22.159 --> 00:10:26.720
have much excitement, but a week
after empty chair and his lie detector did

124
00:10:26.759 --> 00:10:31.919
an analysis of the video. He
consulted sources on the site and, according

125
00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:35.240
to his investigations, it is President
Peto, who appears in the video.

126
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:39.840
According to this media, he consulted
with the House of Nariño, which neither

127
00:10:39.919 --> 00:10:43.200
denied nor confirmed that it was the
President. Faced with the question asked in

128
00:10:43.279 --> 00:10:48.240
two of July, they replied that
Palacio does not take positions on personal matters

129
00:10:48.279 --> 00:10:52.159
and that he addressed quotation marks.
No staff member is authorized to comment.

130
00:10:54.320 --> 00:10:58.399
I close quotes according to the empty
chair. There are several direct testimonies from

131
00:10:58.440 --> 00:11:01.480
people who came or President Petro walking
hand in hand with the woman, they

132
00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:07.080
also found that it was not an
altered video or created by artificial intelligence.

133
00:11:07.559 --> 00:11:11.200
But beyond the fact that, in
fact, the video is true that,

134
00:11:11.360 --> 00:11:13.840
in fact, President Petro walked hand
in hand with a woman in the historic

135
00:11:13.919 --> 00:11:18.320
center of Panama, because this is
news and deserves to be covered I looked

136
00:11:18.399 --> 00:11:26.440
for journalist Angela Patricia Janiot to answer
this question. The private life of a

137
00:11:26.519 --> 00:11:33.600
public official or of a president should
not be of importance and should not generate

138
00:11:33.720 --> 00:11:39.240
general scrutiny unless there are some eventualities, for example, when private life goes

139
00:11:39.399 --> 00:11:46.440
into public light, moving from private
space to public space. How was the

140
00:11:46.480 --> 00:11:50.519
case with the scandal video in Panama. This generates, of course, the

141
00:11:50.600 --> 00:11:56.039
curiosity of the public, the journalistic
interest and generates several questions. For example,

142
00:11:56.240 --> 00:12:01.720
the video is real, authentic or
a fake video generated with artificial intelligence.

143
00:12:03.320 --> 00:12:07.360
President Petro is the person who appears
in the images, who is the

144
00:12:07.559 --> 00:12:11.399
woman who accompanies him? Well,
President Petro has not denied or confirmed the

145
00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:16.279
veracity of this video, which is
already eloquent, nor has he denied or

146
00:12:16.360 --> 00:12:24.000
confirmed the versions that identified his companion
as a transsexual woman. Another eventuality is

147
00:12:24.120 --> 00:12:31.080
whether the President' s private agenda, Petro' s private life, is

148
00:12:31.320 --> 00:12:35.519
affecting his public agenda, his official
agenda and, of course, this in

149
00:12:35.600 --> 00:12:41.080
the case of Gustavo Petro has a
background, because it is already known that

150
00:12:41.279 --> 00:12:46.799
the President cancels his presence at some
events in which he is already confirmed or

151
00:12:46.919 --> 00:12:52.320
on several occasions, has arrived late
at these events without giving more explanations,

152
00:12:52.279 --> 00:12:56.600
because he has private matters to fulfill. We should all be interested in that.

153
00:12:56.879 --> 00:13:01.200
And there is a third possibility,
and that is that if public money

154
00:13:01.720 --> 00:13:05.519
is committed in that private agenda,
that must also generate, of course,

155
00:13:05.840 --> 00:13:13.360
ethical questioning and, because it generates
a problem of conflict of interest. I

156
00:13:13.480 --> 00:13:16.039
also looked for the peléodista, the
Cristina retrepo to ask the same question and

157
00:13:16.320 --> 00:13:22.440
this is an answer. The first
consideration is whether other Presidents of Colombia have

158
00:13:22.480 --> 00:13:26.759
been screened equally their potentials or possible
extramarital affairs. And the answer is no,

159
00:13:26.879 --> 00:13:30.840
even though we have known that there
is. That' s the first

160
00:13:30.840 --> 00:13:33.480
thing. Secondly, the intimate life
of a President is not relevant to public

161
00:13:33.639 --> 00:13:39.679
opinion unless he is first using public
resources, secondly, if he is affecting

162
00:13:39.879 --> 00:13:43.879
the security of the country or,
thirdly, if the President is violating his

163
00:13:43.960 --> 00:13:46.639
oath to the Constitution and the laws
which, for that does not seem to

164
00:13:46.720 --> 00:13:50.279
be the case. A third point
and that seems to me the most interesting

165
00:13:50.360 --> 00:13:56.440
thing here is because a President like
Gustavo Petro allowed him to be held by

166
00:13:56.559 --> 00:14:00.200
the hand with a woman who is
not his wife, because Gusto state,

167
00:14:00.519 --> 00:14:03.840
but was in a public place,
in a city full of journalists, i

168
00:14:03.919 --> 00:14:05.399
e, knew that they would see
him. And then, like nobody else,

169
00:14:05.960 --> 00:14:09.200
as in the mainstream media, they
didn' t make a fuss,

170
00:14:09.320 --> 00:14:13.799
he came out on the X-
Net with an ambiguous message, supporting the

171
00:14:15.039 --> 00:14:18.360
trans community and declaring then without any
need to be heterosexual. That for me

172
00:14:18.440 --> 00:14:22.799
is the question we should ask ourselves
here now is that we are not asking

173
00:14:22.919 --> 00:14:26.480
the right questions. First is why
you let yourself be seen? Why wasn

174
00:14:26.480 --> 00:14:28.360
' t he hiding? Why did
you show yourself? Why And the other

175
00:14:28.480 --> 00:14:33.799
question already journalism is why if Petro, President Petro, has so many times

176
00:14:35.039 --> 00:14:39.200
missed events or arrives late or does
not show up, why is it chosen

177
00:14:39.360 --> 00:14:45.159
when the President goes out with a
trans woman like the moment when he wants

178
00:14:45.240 --> 00:14:48.879
to do fac check and the step- by- step scrutiny of what he

179
00:14:48.039 --> 00:14:52.399
did. Why it wasn' t
done before in any of his dozens of

180
00:14:52.480 --> 00:14:56.720
previous defaults. And now, yes, that' s the kind of journalism

181
00:14:56.799 --> 00:15:01.080
we want to do. This is
not the first time that the intimate life

182
00:15:01.159 --> 00:15:05.919
of a President of Colombia has become
news. We have already discussed this in

183
00:15:07.039 --> 00:15:11.000
chapter five. For example, as
President Ivan, Duke on social media,

184
00:15:11.080 --> 00:15:15.519
rumor spread that his head of gabinetic
Maria Paula Correa was his lover. Like

185
00:15:15.639 --> 00:15:18.480
all gossip, there was never evidence
that that was true. Nor were there

186
00:15:18.519 --> 00:15:24.360
any official pronouncements in this regard.
The media also did not give it importance

187
00:15:24.559 --> 00:15:28.720
and no news was recorded about it. Only in his book, the latest

188
00:15:28.799 --> 00:15:33.679
anti- memorial line of a chief
of staff, published this year, Correa

189
00:15:33.759 --> 00:15:37.240
dedicated a space to this topic.
The chief of staff told Bro Comillas,

190
00:15:37.679 --> 00:15:41.399
" I want to talk head-
on and say that just because I'

191
00:15:41.480 --> 00:15:45.080
m a young woman and because of
the position I have to be the president

192
00:15:45.080 --> 00:15:48.639
' s maid" They don'
t think I' m capable and I

193
00:15:48.639 --> 00:15:50.799
have the capabilities to do it.
I close Comillas, But, as I

194
00:15:50.960 --> 00:15:54.039
said, beyond the mockery and trend
on social networks, the issue did not

195
00:15:54.200 --> 00:16:00.000
transcend as news in any medium.
The debate about the life of the public

196
00:16:00.120 --> 00:16:03.000
and the presidents and people with high
positions of power is old and is both

197
00:16:03.320 --> 00:16:08.279
long and wide. Much has been
written and debated about it. One of

198
00:16:08.360 --> 00:16:12.600
those many analyses is that of Nercathal, an academic at George Stown University,

199
00:16:14.039 --> 00:16:18.360
who in the year 2, 000
wrote the document The Public and Private Lives

200
00:16:18.440 --> 00:16:22.759
of the Presidents, in which he
reflects on this separation. Among other things,

201
00:16:23.080 --> 00:16:27.320
Kaital concludes that the distinction between the
intimate and public life of a President

202
00:16:27.399 --> 00:16:33.120
or President is not fully valid because
of the unique nature of the Presidency,

203
00:16:33.480 --> 00:16:37.600
which is in office 24 hours a
day every day of the week, and

204
00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:42.519
further argues that this special constitutional status
exerts prices on the distinction between the public

205
00:16:42.639 --> 00:16:47.879
and the private and that the Presidents
have only a limited reservation of secrecy to

206
00:16:48.000 --> 00:16:52.399
appeal to. And one argument that
comes up when you talk about this issue

207
00:16:52.519 --> 00:16:57.720
is that everyone, including public figures, has the right to privacy. But

208
00:16:57.759 --> 00:17:03.759
when a person enters public life,
he must understand certain issues that could be

209
00:17:03.840 --> 00:17:10.440
considered private for a private individual can
become matters of reasonable public interest. When

210
00:17:10.559 --> 00:17:15.759
that individual is running for a position, become a public servant, significant to

211
00:17:15.839 --> 00:17:19.480
put the public interest to its own. In an article published in Harvard Politics

212
00:17:19.599 --> 00:17:25.640
Review of that university, it reflects
on the pros and cons of publicizing the

213
00:17:25.880 --> 00:17:30.279
private life of politicians. On the
one hand, almost everyone rationally agrees that

214
00:17:30.359 --> 00:17:34.559
gossip about the private life of public
figures should never be the focus of media

215
00:17:34.599 --> 00:17:37.920
attention, but at the same time, there is an almost implicit expectation that

216
00:17:37.920 --> 00:17:45.279
public figures should act as a model
of that behavior. But one of the

217
00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:51.039
most important points that this article touches
is the difference between the reaction of the

218
00:17:51.160 --> 00:17:56.839
public in different countries to the behavior
of their presidents. And he cites as

219
00:17:56.160 --> 00:18:00.599
an example the case of the former
Prime Minister of Italy, Silvio de Rusconic,

220
00:18:00.079 --> 00:18:06.000
who had several sexual scandals involving sex
workers, and yet this did not

221
00:18:06.119 --> 00:18:10.440
result in a political trial for that
issue, while in countries like the United

222
00:18:10.480 --> 00:18:14.200
States, these events, such as
Clinton' s or more recently Trump'

223
00:18:14.200 --> 00:18:17.839
s, are scandals to which they
are devoted a lot of time and ink.

224
00:18:18.759 --> 00:18:22.960
According to the Harvard Political Review,
this may be due to religious differences.

225
00:18:23.519 --> 00:18:27.720
While it was adultery, it can
be considered a scandal in a Christian

226
00:18:27.759 --> 00:18:33.599
country or any country with a monogamous
majority. It can be perfectly tolerated in

227
00:18:33.680 --> 00:18:37.119
countries with a non-élite,
ruling and polygamous population. An example of

228
00:18:37.240 --> 00:18:41.960
this is that in the United States, Democratic Congressman Anthony Winner resigned, after

229
00:18:41.240 --> 00:18:45.839
it was known that he was sent
photoshile, I was stripped of several women.

230
00:18:45.960 --> 00:18:51.359
Several years later he was charged and
sentenced for doing the same with minors.

231
00:18:52.680 --> 00:18:55.720
And, on the other hand,
the French learned at the funeral of

232
00:18:55.799 --> 00:19:00.039
the former Fraste Amitrant, who had
a second secret family and also benefit from

233
00:19:00.119 --> 00:19:06.039
public funds. About the ethical behavior
of a ruler in his intimate life.

234
00:19:06.279 --> 00:19:10.359
There are also many questions and many
positions. One of them is that if

235
00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:14.759
a politician behaves badly in private matters, he could act in the same way

236
00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:18.759
with his public duties. Then,
under this hypothesis, if a president is

237
00:19:18.880 --> 00:19:22.480
unfaithful to his wife, he is
a person who cannot be trusted, because

238
00:19:22.680 --> 00:19:27.759
he is not ethical. This discussion
is broad and interesting, and Joudi Nutler

239
00:19:27.880 --> 00:19:33.759
and Miriam Schurman, politicians at the
Marcula Center for Applied Ethics at the University

240
00:19:33.839 --> 00:19:37.759
of Santa Clara, wrote an essay
on the subject. According to Nadler and

241
00:19:37.759 --> 00:19:41.640
Shulman, deep down, this question
is a form of a long- standing

242
00:19:41.720 --> 00:19:47.640
equian debate about what is called the
unity of virtues. For many of the

243
00:19:47.720 --> 00:19:52.000
ancient Greek philosophers, a person could
not possess one of the cardinal virtues virulence

244
00:19:52.200 --> 00:19:57.359
that in iron courage of justice without
possessing them all. Then, from this

245
00:19:57.480 --> 00:20:02.519
point of view, how to be
able would be a person who cannot control

246
00:20:02.799 --> 00:20:07.000
his appetites or it is intemperate to
be just or prudent. Socrates, for

247
00:20:07.079 --> 00:20:11.079
example, believed that virtue depended on
understanding. Then, when a person understands

248
00:20:11.160 --> 00:20:15.319
good and evil, he will act
prudently, tempered, courageously and righteously.

249
00:20:17.720 --> 00:20:22.519
Many people believe in this which Socrates
proposed about the unity of virtues. So

250
00:20:22.680 --> 00:20:25.960
in general, it is believed that
a politician who cheats on his wife is

251
00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:30.240
not worthy of trust in public affairs. To this we must add that one

252
00:20:30.359 --> 00:20:36.519
of the main functions of the public
sphere is considered educational and that it must

253
00:20:36.680 --> 00:20:41.279
help to form the souls of the
next generation in order to achieve knowledge and

254
00:20:41.279 --> 00:20:45.400
to act correctly. In this context, a public servant should be an example

255
00:20:45.480 --> 00:20:49.599
of good conduct. However, if
anything has taught us political history, it

256
00:20:49.960 --> 00:20:53.880
is that to be President, Prime
Minister or Emperor does not require the unity

257
00:20:53.920 --> 00:21:00.319
of virtues. Moreover, it requires
many virtues. I stay then it is

258
00:21:00.400 --> 00:21:03.400
with doubt that a politician can be
ethical in public if he is not in

259
00:21:03.480 --> 00:21:10.200
his private life. This was answered
by journalist Daniel Coronel. I believe that

260
00:21:10.400 --> 00:21:15.160
private ethics cannot be deduced from public
ethics. However, I believe that if

261
00:21:15.240 --> 00:21:22.000
there is a limit between what is
public and researchable in anyone even public men

262
00:21:22.079 --> 00:21:26.720
there is a margin of private life
that must be respected. This does not

263
00:21:26.799 --> 00:21:30.319
mean that there may be a dichotomy
between what they do in public and what

264
00:21:30.400 --> 00:21:36.119
they do in private, but only
what affects their public performance can be investigated

265
00:21:36.200 --> 00:21:38.799
and published. And this, then, is not something that goes in line

266
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:42.480
with many cultures. For example,
in the United States, he recalls the

267
00:21:44.039 --> 00:21:48.559
scandal of the Democratic candidate for the
presidency, Gerry Hart, who fell for

268
00:21:48.599 --> 00:21:51.319
having a lover. Possibly that wouldn' t have been a point of inquiry.

269
00:21:51.400 --> 00:21:56.039
In Colombia, where we have a
different culture and where candidate heads of

270
00:21:56.359 --> 00:22:02.480
state have enjoyed a respect and prudence, let us say great press towards their

271
00:22:02.799 --> 00:22:07.640
public activity. But in general,
ethics is an area. The private and

272
00:22:07.680 --> 00:22:12.160
the public. For many other people, the line between the personal and the

273
00:22:12.240 --> 00:22:17.400
public is sharp and they delay it
in a slightly different place. On the

274
00:22:17.480 --> 00:22:22.000
one hand, if in his personal
life the President misuses public resources, i

275
00:22:22.319 --> 00:22:26.000
e, if, by mere chance, the President is a fanatic of howkey

276
00:22:26.039 --> 00:22:29.640
on ice and with public resources,
Canada is followed every weekend to have matches

277
00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:34.359
of this sport on the presidential plane. Another line that divides these two worlds,

278
00:22:34.799 --> 00:22:38.920
the intimate and the public, is
the one that defines whether a private

279
00:22:40.119 --> 00:22:42.920
matter affects the performance of the duties
of the official, in this case,

280
00:22:44.119 --> 00:22:47.839
ceases to be a matter of his
intimate sphere and becomes of public interest.

281
00:22:48.799 --> 00:22:52.119
In this sense, physical and mental
health is important information for the public.

282
00:22:53.440 --> 00:22:59.200
Thus, diseases that affect the work
performance of local officials can be topics of

283
00:22:59.279 --> 00:23:04.640
mesmerizing research. The same is true
of behaviors that could impede the performance of

284
00:23:04.680 --> 00:23:10.039
a president, such as substance abuse, which should be a matter of public

285
00:23:10.079 --> 00:23:15.400
interest. Financial problems, especially in
a person with budgetary responsibilities, may also

286
00:23:15.480 --> 00:23:21.319
be relevant. In many cases,
the mental health of several presidents around the

287
00:23:21.400 --> 00:23:25.920
world has served as an argument by
their opponents to criticize him. We have

288
00:23:25.960 --> 00:23:30.720
seen this in a number of cases, but more recently with candidate President Joe

289
00:23:30.720 --> 00:23:33.920
Biden, whom even his co-
partisans have asked to be part of the

290
00:23:34.119 --> 00:23:38.640
campaign for several lax who make doubt
his mental service. In fact, there

291
00:23:38.799 --> 00:23:42.720
has always been a rumor of former
president and Virgilio Barco began suffering from Alzheimer

292
00:23:42.759 --> 00:23:47.839
' s even during his term of
office, and that is why his mutism

293
00:23:47.880 --> 00:23:53.039
and strange behavior must be public or
deprived of the mental and physical health of

294
00:23:53.079 --> 00:23:59.119
the Presidents. I asked the question
to journalist Maria Elvira Samper and this she

295
00:23:59.200 --> 00:24:03.799
told me to answer must take into
account a frame of reference. First,

296
00:24:03.920 --> 00:24:08.759
that the citizenry has the right to
sound relevant information about its rulers, Second,

297
00:24:10.160 --> 00:24:12.200
that the rulers have the right to
their private life and, third,

298
00:24:12.519 --> 00:24:17.279
that those rights are not absolute.
Thus, in this context, the private

299
00:24:17.400 --> 00:24:22.000
mastery of the Presidents is reduced and
information about their health, both mental and

300
00:24:22.079 --> 00:24:26.480
physical, is of public interest because
it can affect or interfere with their functions.

301
00:24:26.680 --> 00:24:29.799
Now, I' m not a
psychologist, I' m not a

302
00:24:29.839 --> 00:24:33.599
psychiatrist either, but I' d
say mental health is more than the absence

303
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:36.400
of mental disorders. I think it
also has to do with states with a

304
00:24:36.480 --> 00:24:38.680
high degree of distress, stress or
anxiety, memory loss, mental lapses,

305
00:24:40.160 --> 00:24:45.440
confusion, difficulties in communicating and disorientation, also with addictions, emotional compulsion,

306
00:24:45.319 --> 00:24:51.440
impulsiveness, narcissism, proclivity to lies
and lack of empathy. The catalogue is

307
00:24:51.519 --> 00:24:55.359
broad, and both the President and
former President Trump, who was in the

308
00:24:55.440 --> 00:25:00.200
White House and aspires to repeat,
fit some of these categories, but they

309
00:25:00.200 --> 00:25:03.799
are very much wondering why this matter
is important, and the answer is that

310
00:25:04.200 --> 00:25:08.400
the Twenty- Fifth Amendment to the
United States Constitution says that, if the

311
00:25:08.480 --> 00:25:14.640
President is considered to be quotation marks
unable to exercise the rights and obligations of

312
00:25:14.759 --> 00:25:19.039
his office I close quotes, the
Vice President must take his place. Another

313
00:25:19.359 --> 00:25:23.400
aspect that has caused debate is the
consumption of substances. For example, if

314
00:25:23.480 --> 00:25:30.960
a President smokes cigarettes he must often
be public knowledge. You should have the

315
00:25:30.039 --> 00:25:33.559
citizenship to know if a president smokes
marijuana at night or if he takes a

316
00:25:33.599 --> 00:25:37.440
couple of glasses of whiskey every day. On the one hand, one might

317
00:25:37.720 --> 00:25:41.160
say that if the consumption of substances
affects their decisions, it must be reviewed.

318
00:25:41.440 --> 00:25:45.519
I mean he decides the education budget
with a couple of suits and liquor

319
00:25:45.559 --> 00:25:49.599
on his head or under the effects
of marijuana is good or bad that decision

320
00:25:49.680 --> 00:25:56.079
he made. Perhaps there is moralism
in the discussion and many people will claim

321
00:25:56.160 --> 00:25:59.519
that it is not the same to
have a glass of whiskey as to smoke

322
00:25:59.519 --> 00:26:03.400
a marijuana cigarette. Other people will
say that the important thing is that the

323
00:26:03.519 --> 00:26:06.960
use is not problematic and does not
affect the mental abilities of the President.

324
00:26:07.160 --> 00:26:11.960
A President must be abstemious in every
way. What' s the limit.

325
00:26:11.759 --> 00:26:15.759
The question is transferred to journalist Daniel
San Pedro Espino Let' s hear what

326
00:26:18.319 --> 00:26:21.480
he told me good. I imagine
anyone would think that there are trades that

327
00:26:21.559 --> 00:26:25.519
demand to be a hundred percent obstetric. I don' t know a surgeon

328
00:26:25.559 --> 00:26:27.519
can' t operate with a couple
of whiskeys on his head, for example,

329
00:26:27.720 --> 00:26:30.440
or a pilot can' t answer
for a flight after taking tequila.

330
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:34.839
In the case of a President,
it should therefore be similar. Unless it

331
00:26:36.039 --> 00:26:40.240
is clear President of Circombia, the
truth is that our country circus, several

332
00:26:40.279 --> 00:26:45.279
presidents have endured the tragedy of driving
the ship steeping elbow, seems like a

333
00:26:45.279 --> 00:26:52.519
country driven by drunks that we do. The rulers should be abstract is the

334
00:26:52.559 --> 00:26:56.640
truth. By contrast, that'
s for those of us who have to

335
00:26:56.640 --> 00:27:04.079
endure them. Empires have been shaken
and governments have fallen due to the private

336
00:27:04.160 --> 00:27:10.640
indiscretion of their rulers. But also
world leaders must have committed acts that many

337
00:27:10.759 --> 00:27:15.319
would consider unethical or reprehensible, and
yet they have had good results and done

338
00:27:15.480 --> 00:27:21.559
good things for their people. The
public should worry about the private life of

339
00:27:21.599 --> 00:27:29.759
a leader or should focus only on
public actions that directly impact governance. Unfortunately,

340
00:27:30.079 --> 00:27:33.559
there does not seem to be a
definitive answer. The answer is most

341
00:27:33.640 --> 00:27:37.960
likely to be yes to both questions
To a certain extent, this chapter,

342
00:27:38.240 --> 00:27:42.319
honoring the name of the program,
leaves me with more concerns than certainties.

343
00:27:44.079 --> 00:27:47.680
I don' t think there'
s a universal answer. It will depend

344
00:27:47.880 --> 00:27:52.079
on each case whether certain aspects of
a president' s intimate life should be

345
00:27:52.079 --> 00:27:56.839
made public. They almost always speak
louder about their actions and results in the

346
00:27:56.160 --> 00:28:02.079
power of gossip and details of their
private life. I am Roberto Bom and

347
00:28:02.119 --> 00:28:06.039
this was chapter ninety- seven of
my questions. See you on the next

348
00:28:06.119 --> 00:28:11.000
road From now on, this chapter
of my questions is available on all podcast

349
00:28:11.119 --> 00:28:19.079
platforms. This episode was made possible
by Kafan. Family compensation box. Dirección

350
00:28:19.319 --> 00:28:25.720
Roberto Pombo, Producción General Juan Abel
Gutiérrez, Asesor editorial, Daniel San Pedro

351
00:28:25.799 --> 00:28:30.640
Espina, Guiones juan Abel Gutiérrez y
Johnny Rodríguez. Field production Marcela Salazar and

352
00:28:30.799 --> 00:28:34.279
Lucía Beltrán. Post- production of
audio Carlos Bernar