Los juristas de cámara del sanchismo
La batalla jurídica contra la amnistía es muy trascendente. No es algo baladí. Es necesario defender el Estado de Derecho y la separación de poderes. No es la primera vez que el poder político utiliza el ordenamiento legal de una democracia para...
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed La batalla jurídica contra la amnistía es muy trascendente. No es algo baladí. Es necesario defender el Estado de Derecho y la separación de poderes. No es la primera vez que el poder político utiliza el ordenamiento legal de una democracia para imponer leyes que atentan contra la Constitución. Ha sucedido otras veces y volverá a suceder. No hay que sorprenderse porque existan juristas de cámara que lo validen. A la hora de plantearme si es posible evitar este tipo de procesos, el catedrático alemán Bernd Rüthers escribió que es necesario contar con «una generación de juristas que se sienta vinculada al orden democrático de libertades, que sepa de la dimensión política de su profesión y que ponga sus herramientas teóricas al servicio de la Constitución y para su defensa» (Derecho degenerado. Marcial Pons, 2016, pág. 49). Tras las últimas actuaciones del Tribunal Constitucional, como sucede con los ERE, nada podemos esperar de quienes están perpetrando una escandalosa mutación constitucional. Una vez más nos encontramos con el uso alternativo del Derecho para ponerlo al servicio de los intereses partidistas del poder político.
0:08 The jurists of the Chamber of Sanchism. The legal battle against the Ministry is very important. It is not a balade because it is necessary to defend the rule of law and the separation of powers. This is not the first time that political power has used the legal order of a democracy to impose laws that violate the Constitution. It has happened other times and it will happen again. It is not surprising that there are legal experts from the Chamber who validate it. When it comes to considering whether this kind of process can be avoided, Professor Bern Ruthers wrote that it is necessary to have a generation of jurists who feel linked to the democratic order of freedoms, who know the political dimension and their profession and who put their theoretical tools at the service of the Constitution and for its defence. This he wrote in Degenerate Law of the martial publishing house published in Spain by the edition of Martial Pons. After the last actions of the Constitutional Trunal, as with the Beings, we can expect nothing from those who are perpetrating a scandalous constitutional change. Once again, we find the alternative use of law to put it at the service of the partisan interests of political power. It is the only possible conclusion to establish a stubborn and unacceptable will to systematically sideline the Supreme. A group of brilliant jurists, with the decisive participation of Hugo Preus, drew up the Bainmark Constitution, but a few years later others helped to demolish it. It is a very interesting document, which has had a remarkable influence on contemporary constitutionalism. Those chamber jurists came to power
1:40 and served the German people. Sanchism is uncomfortable with the separation of powers, as it considers that the legislative power has to be a mere belt of transmission of the will of the radical left government and its allies. For its part, the judiciary should lower popular justice subject to sovereignty. Or said to go to the Congress of Deputies, the role of the opposition should be limited to being part of the landscape. They have turned the Constitutional into a political body with a majority of progressive magistrates serving the demolition of the constitutional architecture, as has been proven in the recent controversial judgments. Fortunately, we are part of the European Union. Fear of the State of the Rule of Law Report explains that agreement has been reached on the General Council of the Judiciary