Las chapuzas legislativas del sanchismo
o podemos acostumbrarnos a que las chapuzas sean la técnica legislativa que caracterice al Gobierno socialista comunista y sus aliados. Es la marca de fábrica del sanchismo. El Tribunal Constitucional, antes de la llegada de Cándido Conde-Pumpido, ha...
o podemos acostumbrarnos a que las chapuzas sean la técnica legislativa que caracterice al Gobierno socialista comunista y sus aliados. Es la marca de fábrica del sanchismo. El Tribunal Constitucional, antes de la llegada de Cándido Conde-Pumpido, ha venido censurando que se introduzcan modificaciones legales utilizando proyectos o proposiciones de ley que no tienen nada que ver. Es un despropósito que refleja tanto el desprecio por el Poder Legislativo como la impericia de sus autores. Un buen jurista jamás actuaría de esta forma, pero vivimos tiempos en los que florecen en la izquierda radical personajes como el presidente del Constitucional, Segoviano, Montalbán, Díez, Balaguer, Urías, Pérez-Royo o Martín Pallín que son antes sanchistas que juristas. Por ello, no nos sorprendamos ante las futuras sentencias o pumpidazos que modifiquen la doctrina del Constitucional para ajustarla a los intereses de La Moncloa y sus aliados.
1
00:00:08.679 --> 00:00:16.440
The legislative blunders of Sanchismo. We
can' t get used to the splashes
2
00:00:16.440 --> 00:00:21.679
being. The legislative technique that characterizes
the communist socialist government and its allies is
3
00:00:21.719 --> 00:00:26.199
the brand name of Sanchismo. The
Constitutional Court, before the arrival of Candido
4
00:00:26.239 --> 00:00:32.479
Contempudo, has been censoring the introduction
of legal amendments, using in drafts or
5
00:00:32.560 --> 00:00:36.640
proposals of law that have nothing to
do with it. It is a nonsense
6
00:00:36.719 --> 00:00:41.079
that reflects both the contempt for registrative
power and the impermissibility of its authors.
7
00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:46.200
A good jurist would never act this
way. But we live in times in
8
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:52.600
which characters like the President of the
Constitutional, Segoviano Montalbán DÃez Balaguer, as
9
00:00:52.960 --> 00:00:57.439
well as Urias Preroyo MartÃn PaylÃn,
who are before Sanchistas rather than jurists,
10
00:00:58.039 --> 00:01:00.359
flourish on the radical left. Therefore, let us not be surprised at the
11
00:01:00.439 --> 00:01:07.480
future sentences or punishments that will modify
the Constitutional Court to suit the interests of
12
00:01:07.519 --> 00:01:10.560
the Moncloa of its allies. In
the latter case, I do not rule
13
00:01:10.640 --> 00:01:14.959
out that the weight leader let you
fall when it suits you and is the
14
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:19.400
final finish of your career, having
irreversibly stained your robe. In this case,
15
00:01:19.439 --> 00:01:23.959
they have taken advantage of the decree
on anti- crisis measures to provide
16
00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:27.040
the Amnesty that joins the parity bill
to circumvent the power owed to the spending
17
00:01:27.120 --> 00:01:30.560
ceiling of the Senate, that is, as the Upper House does not control.
18
00:01:30.719 --> 00:01:36.280
It is better not to engage in
dialogue with the opposition and to impose
19
00:01:36.280 --> 00:01:38.760
a legislative amendment so that the Government
can do whatever it wants. In the
20
00:01:38.799 --> 00:01:42.640
case of Amnesty law, it is
intended to give its controversial application and to
21
00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:47.079
prevent the effects of the question referred
for a preliminary ruling before the Court of
22
00:01:47.079 --> 00:01:49.239
Justice of the European Union. Of
course, Sánchez gives way once again to
23
00:01:49.280 --> 00:01:55.200
the independents. In any case,
he cannot overcome the stigma of having passed
24
00:01:55.280 --> 00:01:59.719
an illegal and illegitimate law, which
has a fraudi and slow origin and which
25
00:01:59.519 --> 00:02:02.519
consecrates a false account of the rebellion, as he himself defined it against the
26
00:02:02.599 --> 00:02:09.080
constitutional and statutory order. In the
same line, the prosecutor' s office
27
00:02:09.199 --> 00:02:14.599
is registered, which asked for two
hundred and forty- eight years in prison
28
00:02:14.719 --> 00:02:19.759
for the twelve accused of terrorism in
the CD and now defines the application of
29
00:02:19.800 --> 00:02:23.759
Amnesty because they are not accused of
serious human rights violations or of any death.
30
00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:25.439
Apparently, they were just a little
terrorist.
