La política de los frentes populares
Las consecuencias de la estrategia de radicalización social que conocemos como frentes populares son siempre negativas. Es cierto que sus promotores pueden...
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed Las consecuencias de la estrategia de radicalización social que conocemos como frentes populares son siempre negativas. Es cierto que sus promotores pueden conseguir a corto plazo el resultado deseado, pero no hacen más que aplazar el problema. Por supuesto, estos frentes están llenos de radicales y antisistema que son muy peligrosos para la convivencia y la democracia. En muchos casos aparecen demagogos como Mélenchon que son el caballo de Troya, consciente o inconsciente, del comunismo que ha blanqueado la izquierda mediática y sus «compañeros de viaje» entre los intelectuales. Es algo que hemos visto en el siglo XX, pero que nos podemos remontar a la República romana para constatar la existencia de peligrosos populistas que basan su discurso en el odio. Otra muestra, además de la Unión Soviética y sus países satélites, la encontramos en la Revolución francesa y las monstruosidades que se cometieron al grito de «libertad, igualdad y fraternidad». Nunca he compartido la absurda idealización de este periodo, como sucede con otros en los que surgió lo peor del ser humano. Nada bueno se puede esperar de la izquierda radical, pero tampoco de la ultraderecha.
0:08 The politics of the popular fronts. The consequences of the strategy of social radicalization, which we know as popular fronts, are always negative. It is true that its promoters can achieve the desired result in the short term, but they do nothing but postpone the problem. Of course, these fronts are full of radical anti- systems that are very dangerous for coexistence and democracy. In many cases there are demagogues such as Melenchhon, who are the Trojan horse, conscious or unconscious of communism that has bleached on the media left and his fellow travelers among the intellectuals. It is something we have seen in the twentieth century, but we can go back to the Roman Republic to see the existence of dangerous populists who base their discourse on hatred. Another example, in addition to the Soviet Union and its satellite countries, is found in the French Revolution and the monstrosities that are eaten in the name of equality, freedom and fraternity. I have never shared the absurd idealization of this period, as is the case with similarities in which the worst of human beings arose. Nothing good can be expected from the radical left, but neither from the ultra- right. Unfortunately, we find many examples of political extremism in France of freedom and democracy, from the triumph of the Revolution to the present day. Of course, we can turn in another order of things to the barbarities committed by the European powers with their colonial empires. It is good to emphasize the notable differences with what they did in Spain and Portugal, although some excesses and errors were made. We
1:41 must ignore the idealization of pre- Columbian America as a result of absolute ignorance, or the nonsense of the decolonization of museums, which promotes urtasum as a result of its inconsistent knowledge of history. It' s something that' s solved by reading. Europe has a serious problem with the radicalisation of both signs, as has been shown in France. Although strambithic analyses have been carried out, instead of addressing the problems that cause the disaffection, they have preferred to re- edit the popular fronts, in the French case as a platform and in Spain, with Sanchismo, disqualifying all those who do not accept their sectarian policies and successions to independence. The European Union has been left without leaders who have the political height and vision of the future that their founders had.