La campaña contra el juez Peinado
Hay que reconocer que la izquierda política y mediática es persistente en sus campañas de descalificación. No recuerdo una estrategia contra un magistrado tan brutal e inmisericorde como la que está sufriendo Juan Carlos Peinado. Lo más lamentable es...
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed Hay que reconocer que la izquierda política y mediática es persistente en sus campañas de descalificación. No recuerdo una estrategia contra un magistrado tan brutal e inmisericorde como la que está sufriendo Juan Carlos Peinado. Lo más lamentable es la participación de Grande-Marlaska. Me pregunto cómo reaccionaría si se la hicieran a él. ¿Dónde queda el respeto a la actuación judicial? ¿Alguien merece ser vilipendiado hasta ese extremo por cumplir con su función jurisdiccional habiendo sido avalado, además, por la Audiencia de Madrid? Hay voceros que no me sorprenden, porque están al servicio del poder y no les importa hacer el ridículo. En mi anterior artículo expresaba mi opinión sobre estos expertos en Derecho que han adquirido su formación por ciencia infusa y gracias a los argumentarios. Estos chamanes solo merecen la más absoluta indiferencia. En cambio, el magistrado Marlaska debería ser solidario con Peinado, aunque tenga una opinión distinta. Una vez más me pregunto cómo reaccionaría si en una instrucción suya le hubieran descalificado antes de conocer la conclusión del proceso.
0:08 The campaign against Judge Peinado. It must be recognized that the political and media left is persistent in its disqualification campaigns. I don' t remember a strategy against a magistrate as brutal and merciful as Juan Carlos Peinado is suffering. What is most regrettable is the participation of Grande Marlaska. I wonder how he would react if he were given where there is respect for judicial action. Someone deserves to be vilified up to that point for fulfilling his jurisdictional function, having also been endorsed by the Madrid hearing. There are spokespeople who don' t surprise me because they' re in the service of power and they don' t care to make a fool of themselves. In my previous article, which I have expressed in my opinion on these experts in law who have acquired their education by infuse science and thanks to argumentaries. These shamans only deserve absolute indifference.
0:57 On the other hand, Judge Marlasca should be in solidarity with hairstyle, even if he has a different opinion. Once again, I wonder how I would react if he had been disqualified in his instruction before he knew the conclusion of the process. I do not believe that this strategy of defense of Sánchez and Begoña Gómez, questioning the honorability and qualification of the head of the court in which the case has been brought, is the most sensible. I wouldn' t like, if I were the defense attorney, to find myself with so much political noise that disturbs him. In fact, I would advise Sanchez to show all his kindness and sympathy that when he does, that he does it when it suits him and that he collaborates with a justice, even if he refuses to declare whether the questions affect his status as husband of the investigated woman, nothing of what he does allows to presuppose any guilt. Those of us who believe in the rule of law and the rule of law must defend the presumption of an essence. Therefore, it is not necessary to accept that the judge be declassified and if he is awarded in dark intentions that he is seeking prominence or that he is at the service of a conspiracy are stupid a monumental.
2:00 It is fun to hear Marlaska' s picturesque argument that it is obvious and notorious that he is President of the Government at 24 hours, seven days since he is voted by the Cortes Generales. I imagine you' ll ever take a brief break in your high magistracy, even if it' s to watch a movie,