La campaña contra el juez Peinado
Hay que reconocer que la izquierda política y mediática es persistente en sus campañas de descalificación. No recuerdo una estrategia contra un magistrado tan brutal e inmisericorde como la que está sufriendo Juan Carlos Peinado. Lo más lamentable es...
Hay que reconocer que la izquierda política y mediática es persistente en sus campañas de descalificación. No recuerdo una estrategia contra un magistrado tan brutal e inmisericorde como la que está sufriendo Juan Carlos Peinado. Lo más lamentable es la participación de Grande-Marlaska. Me pregunto cómo reaccionaría si se la hicieran a él. ¿Dónde queda el respeto a la actuación judicial? ¿Alguien merece ser vilipendiado hasta ese extremo por cumplir con su función jurisdiccional habiendo sido avalado, además, por la Audiencia de Madrid? Hay voceros que no me sorprenden, porque están al servicio del poder y no les importa hacer el ridículo. En mi anterior artículo expresaba mi opinión sobre estos expertos en Derecho que han adquirido su formación por ciencia infusa y gracias a los argumentarios. Estos chamanes solo merecen la más absoluta indiferencia. En cambio, el magistrado Marlaska debería ser solidario con Peinado, aunque tenga una opinión distinta. Una vez más me pregunto cómo reaccionaría si en una instrucción suya le hubieran descalificado antes de conocer la conclusión del proceso.
1
00:00:08.279 --> 00:00:13.519
The campaign against Judge Peinado. It
must be recognized that the political and media
2
00:00:14.080 --> 00:00:19.399
left is persistent in its disqualification campaigns. I don' t remember a strategy
3
00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:24.239
against a magistrate as brutal and merciful
as Juan Carlos Peinado is suffering. What
4
00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:29.039
is most regrettable is the participation of
Grande Marlaska. I wonder how he would
5
00:00:29.039 --> 00:00:33.759
react if he were given where there
is respect for judicial action. Someone deserves
6
00:00:33.840 --> 00:00:38.840
to be vilified up to that point
for fulfilling his jurisdictional function, having also
7
00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:43.320
been endorsed by the Madrid hearing.
There are spokespeople who don' t surprise
8
00:00:43.359 --> 00:00:45.880
me because they' re in the
service of power and they don' t
9
00:00:45.880 --> 00:00:47.880
care to make a fool of themselves. In my previous article, which I
10
00:00:47.960 --> 00:00:52.960
have expressed in my opinion on these
experts in law who have acquired their education
11
00:00:53.039 --> 00:00:56.520
by infuse science and thanks to argumentaries. These shamans only deserve absolute indifference.
12
00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:02.159
On the other hand, Judge Marlasca
should be in solidarity with hairstyle, even
13
00:01:02.240 --> 00:01:04.959
if he has a different opinion.
Once again, I wonder how I would
14
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:10.719
react if he had been disqualified in
his instruction before he knew the conclusion of
15
00:01:10.719 --> 00:01:14.439
the process. I do not believe
that this strategy of defense of Sánchez and
16
00:01:14.439 --> 00:01:18.560
Begoña Gómez, questioning the honorability and
qualification of the head of the court in
17
00:01:18.599 --> 00:01:22.120
which the case has been brought,
is the most sensible. I wouldn'
18
00:01:22.120 --> 00:01:26.319
t like, if I were the
defense attorney, to find myself with so
19
00:01:26.319 --> 00:01:27.799
much political noise that disturbs him.
In fact, I would advise Sanchez to
20
00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:33.079
show all his kindness and sympathy that
when he does, that he does it
21
00:01:33.120 --> 00:01:38.560
when it suits him and that he
collaborates with a justice, even if he
22
00:01:38.599 --> 00:01:42.599
refuses to declare whether the questions affect
his status as husband of the investigated woman,
23
00:01:42.760 --> 00:01:45.959
nothing of what he does allows to
presuppose any guilt. Those of us
24
00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:49.120
who believe in the rule of law
and the rule of law must defend the
25
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:52.680
presumption of an essence. Therefore,
it is not necessary to accept that the
26
00:01:52.760 --> 00:01:57.319
judge be declassified and if he is
awarded in dark intentions that he is seeking
27
00:01:57.359 --> 00:02:00.680
prominence or that he is at the
service of a conspiracy are stupid a monumental.
28
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:05.439
It is fun to hear Marlaska'
s picturesque argument that it is obvious
29
00:02:05.480 --> 00:02:07.840
and notorious that he is President of
the Government at 24 hours, seven days
30
00:02:07.879 --> 00:02:12.439
since he is voted by the Cortes
Generales. I imagine you' ll ever
31
00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:15.639
take a brief break in your high
magistracy, even if it' s to
32
00:02:15.639 --> 00:02:15.639
watch a movie,
