July 24, 2024

La amnistía y el Tribunal Constitucional

La amnistía y el Tribunal Constitucional

Ha llegado el momento tan esperado. La Sala de lo Penal del Tribunal Supremo, formada por los magistrados expertos en Derecho Penal más prestigiosos de nuestro país, ha promovido una cuestión de inconstitucionalidad en relación con el artículo 1 de la...

Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

Ha llegado el momento tan esperado. La Sala de lo Penal del Tribunal Supremo, formada por los magistrados expertos en Derecho Penal más prestigiosos de nuestro país, ha promovido una cuestión de inconstitucionalidad en relación con el artículo 1 de la ley Orgánica de amnistía a la que los socialistas añadieron el pomposo y falaz título «para la normalización institucional, política y social en Cataluña». El contenido del auto es demoledor, porque establece que «vulnera el derecho constitucional a la igualdad ante la ley» y «los principios de seguridad jurídica y proscripción de la arbitrariedad que proclama la Constitución» a la vez que podría vulnerar el «principio de exclusividad jurisdiccional». El Gobierno de izquierda radical espera que Conde-Pumpido cumpla con su papel y declare la constitucionalidad de la norma. No importa que el propio Sánchez dijera en su día que no lo era o que reconociera que la impulsó para comprar la investidura, lo que muestra el fin ilegítimo de la norma. El presidente del Constitucional es un experto jurista, magistrado de esa Sala y fue uno de los fundadores de la asociación progresista «Jueces y Juezas para la democracia». Fue Fiscal General del Estado nombrado por un gobierno socialista.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:08.279 --> 00:00:14.279
Amnesty and the Constitutional Court. The
long- awaited time has come. The

2
00:00:14.439 --> 00:00:19.039
criminal saga of the Supreme Court,
made up of the most prestigious criminal law

3
00:00:19.079 --> 00:00:24.320
judges in our country, has promoted
a question of unconstitutionality in relation to article

4
00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:27.920
one of Amnesty' s organic law, to which socialists added the pompous and

5
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:35.640
fallacious title for institutional, political and
social normalization in Catalonia. The content of

6
00:00:35.719 --> 00:00:40.119
the order is devastating because it establishes
that it violates the constitutional right to equality

7
00:00:40.200 --> 00:00:45.000
before the law and the principles of
legal certainty and prohibition of arbitrariness proclaimed by

8
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:49.240
the Constitution, while at the same
time violating the principle of jurisdictional exclusivity.

9
00:00:49.799 --> 00:00:53.759
The radical left- wing government hopes
that Conde fumpido will fulfill his role and

10
00:00:53.920 --> 00:00:58.079
declare the constitutionality of the norm.
It does not matter that Sánchez himself said

11
00:00:58.119 --> 00:01:00.640
in his day that it was not
that c or r n knew that he

12
00:01:00.759 --> 00:01:03.959
pushed her to buy the investiture,
which shows the illegitimate end of the norm.

13
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:08.359
The Constitutional President is an expert jurist, judge of that chamber and was

14
00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:14.200
one of the founders of the Progressive
Association Judges and Judges for Democracy. He

15
00:01:14.200 --> 00:01:18.120
was the Attorney General of the State
appointed by a socialist government. The other

16
00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:23.239
magistrates are Campo ex- Minister of
Professor and Constitutional Affairs and is a member

17
00:01:23.319 --> 00:01:26.319
of the Consultative Council of Andalusia.
Ten former socialist and recent professor Montalbán,

18
00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:33.040
judge of the High Court of Justice
of Andalusia. She is a member of

19
00:01:33.079 --> 00:01:36.959
the General Council of the Judiciary and
a specialist in violence against women. Sáez

20
00:01:37.159 --> 00:01:41.719
was a judge of the national hearing
and was proposed by the united Left to

21
00:01:41.719 --> 00:01:46.640
the General Council of the Judiciary and
the Constitutional and Segovian Court of Labour in

22
00:01:46.640 --> 00:01:51.560
the Supreme. With these curricula and
political trajectories are Sánchez' s hope to

23
00:01:51.599 --> 00:01:56.920
convert into constitutional a norm that the
most prestigious jurists of our country in constitutional,

24
00:01:57.879 --> 00:02:01.239
administrative and criminal law believe it is
not. Of course, nothing to

25
00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:05.959
do with the prestige of the judges
who formed, for example, the first

26
00:02:06.040 --> 00:02:10.360
Constitutional Court. The seven will have
to sideline the issues raised by the Supreme

27
00:02:10.439 --> 00:02:15.560
Magistrates, as well as the positions
of numerous academic and academic prosecutors, with

28
00:02:15.639 --> 00:02:21.680
their decision, will pass into history
as defenders of the constitutional order and the

29
00:02:21.719 --> 00:02:25.639
will clearly expressed by the constituents or
of the alternative use of law and submission

30
00:02:25.719 --> 00:02:27.120
to political power