La amnistía naufraga en Venecia
No hay que ser un fino jurista parahttps://www.larazon.es/espana/comision-venecia-exige-que-amnistia-respete-constitucion-apruebe-mayoria-amplia_2024031565f44c17ab79d80001a5a046.html, al margen del debate sobre su constitucionalidad, es una de las...
No hay que ser un fino jurista para constatar que la proposición de ley de Amnistía, al margen del debate sobre su constitucionalidad, es una de las mayores chapuzas de nuestra historia legislativa. No me refiero a los últimos años o décadas, sino desde los primeros textos que se elaboraron en la Hispania Romana. Es cierto que el sanchismo ha perpetrado auténticos atentados contra el Derecho que no elaboraría ni un estudiante. Este exasperante ejercicio de mediocridad ha alcanzado su culminación con el bodrio perpetrado para complacer a Puigdemont y a los delincuentes que le acompañaron en su rebelión contra el ordenamiento constitucional y estatutario.
1
00:00:08.599 --> 00:00:13.439
Amnesty is shipwrecked in Venice. It
is not necessary to be a fine jurist
2
00:00:13.480 --> 00:00:18.320
to see that Amnesty' s bill, apart from the debate on its constitutionality,
3
00:00:18.679 --> 00:00:22.719
is one of the biggest blunders in
our legislative history. I am not
4
00:00:22.719 --> 00:00:26.600
referring to the last years or decades, but from the first texts that were
5
00:00:26.679 --> 00:00:31.160
elaborated in the Roman Hispania. It
is true that Sanchismo has perpetrated genuine violations
6
00:00:31.239 --> 00:00:36.759
of law that would not be elaborated
by a student. This exasperated exercise of
7
00:00:36.759 --> 00:00:42.320
mediocrity has reached its culmination with the
bodrium perpetrated to please therefore mon and the
8
00:00:42.560 --> 00:00:48.840
criminals who accompanied him in his rebellion
against the constitutional and statutory order. In
9
00:00:48.880 --> 00:00:51.280
the years I have devoted myself to
teaching the history of law and institutions.
10
00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:56.280
I don' t remember in the
compendium of laws that I' ve studied
11
00:00:56.359 --> 00:01:00.840
something approaching this nonsense. The technique
used shows the inconsistency of its authors.
12
00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:06.319
The inconsistency summarized from the explanatory statement
to the articulated text is the result of
13
00:01:06.359 --> 00:01:11.159
its academic gaps. Some do not
believe the rule and others are simply ignorant
14
00:01:11.239 --> 00:01:15.480
of the law. I' m
not surprised to meet the leguleys of juns
15
00:01:15.480 --> 00:01:19.040
and rc. The Venice Commission has
delivered an opinion on the matter. He
16
00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:23.760
' s got everyone to think he' s right. At this point,
17
00:01:23.799 --> 00:01:26.680
it is clear to me that the
Government has not read it. I don
18
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:29.519
' t know if it' s
because you haven' t given them time
19
00:01:29.560 --> 00:01:30.400
to translate it, since it'
s in English. I can recommend you
20
00:01:30.480 --> 00:01:34.159
some program so that you attract your
ideas maybe you haven' t understood it.
21
00:01:34.719 --> 00:01:38.799
My conclusion is that it is devastating
in its assessment that accelerated legislative procedures
22
00:01:38.840 --> 00:01:45.920
are not appropriate and would require a
broad majority. It was picturesque to be
23
00:01:46.200 --> 00:01:49.280
generous for the Government to argue that
the Commission' s opinion unanimously endorsed the
24
00:01:49.319 --> 00:01:53.200
proposal for an amnesty law. Sanchism
has a serious pathology, because I'
25
00:01:53.319 --> 00:01:57.159
m afraid you believe your own lies. It' s something I' ve
26
00:01:57.239 --> 00:02:00.400
seen many times and it doesn'
t surprise me. So much so that
27
00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:05.959
they will impose a law barbed on
the lie of reconciliation, which is technically
28
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:07.520
a podium and which is unequivocally unconstitutional.
