¿La amnistía hará más fuerte a España?
Es evidente que no. Hay muchas razones que lo demuestran. Es una derrota del Estado de Derecho y la consagración de la desigualdad al imponer una institución jurídica que otorga privilegios a unos delincuentes políticos. No tiene un encaje...
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed Es evidente que no. Hay muchas razones que lo demuestran. Es una derrota del Estado de Derecho y la consagración de la desigualdad al imponer una institución jurídica que otorga privilegios a unos delincuentes políticos. No tiene un encaje constitucional, ya que es una extralimitación del Poder Legislativo. La Constitución no le habilita para asumir la competencia de aprobar una amnistía. En este sentido, hay que recordar que no le otorga un poder omnímodo, ya que se aplica el principio de que solo puede ejercer aquellas competencias recogidas en el texto constitucional. La izquierda política y mediática asume, desgraciadamente, el relato falaz de los independentistas. Por ello, Sánchez deslegitima al Poder Judicial cuestionando que hubiera actuado correctamente y va en contra de sus propios actos, cuando apoyó la aplicación del artículo 155 de la Constitución, y declaraciones, al asegurar que había sido una rebelión, que la amnistía era inconstitucional y se comprometió a entregar a Puigdemont al Supremo para que fuera juzgado por los graves delitos que había cometido. La aprobación de la amnistía es un ataque del líder del PSOE contra la Policía, la Guardia Civil, la judicatura y la fiscalía. No se ha producido una agresión más dura y contundente desde la Transición hasta nuestros días.
0:08 Amnesty was stronger in Spain. Clearly, there are not many reasons for this. It is a defeat of the rule of law and the consecration of inequality by imposing a legal institution that grants privileges to political criminals, it is not constitutionally appropriate, as it is an excess of the legislative power. The Constitution does not enable him to assume the competence to pass an Amnesty. In this regard, it should be recalled that it does not confer omnimode power on it, since it applies to the principle that it can exercise only those powers contained in the constitutional text. The political and media left unfortunately assumes the fallacious account of the independenceists. For this reason, Sanchez legitimates the judiciary by questioning that he had acted correctly and i goes against his own actions when he supported the application of article 150 of the O Constitution of his statements by ensuring that it had been a rebellion, that the amnestist was unconstitutional and promised to hand over puys de mon to the Supreme to be tried for the serious crimes he had committed. Amnesty' s approval is an attack by the leader of PESOE against the police, the civil guard, the judiciary and the prosecution. There has been no harsher and more forceful aggression since the transition to the present day.
1:26 Article 173 of the Constitution establishes a reservation of jurisdiction in the courts, since the exercise of judicial authority in all types of proceedings, by trying and enforcing the court, is exclusively the responsibility of the courts and tribunals determined by the laws in accordance with the rules of jurisdiction and procedure established by them. Sanchez and his followers find it indifferent. The separation of powers is broken because the courts cannot pass a law of these characteristics does not matter the legal security, since the legislator erases the law that he himself approved by a criteria of spurious partisan interest that goes against the collective interest. The explanatory statement is based on lies, the constitutional one and the Council of State are falsified while the comparative law is manipulated. It is a legal text that has been changing the convenience of criminals. Once again, it must be remembered that this is an unusual parliamentary procedure in the history of Spain, since there is no precedent of unpurposed size. It has been such a ridiculous and expectant process that the proposed law and suusagiographers themselves proclaim its constitutionality. There is no legitimate purpose that could justify even its processing. Once two in unpurposed size are installed, the unusual procedure is rounded up, threatening judges and prosecutors to be unable to exercise control of legality, accusing them of prevaricating if they do so. It is a crude attempt to politicize the justice that joins the authoritarian drive of the Sanchismo in the
2:59 line of the stanstrategia of the Puebla Group, as well as the constant disqualifications suffered by magistrates, even from the rostrum of the Congress, of the deputies in the exercise of their jurisdictional functions. What happened equates us to the practices carried out by left- wing populist politicians in Ibero- America. The gravity of the attacks is linked to the indolent reaction of Francina Ormengol and Sanchez' s disturbing acquiescence. Of course, it should be recalled that the constituent deputies refused to include those in the Constitution. It was a logical and legitimate position, because crimes against constitutional order cannot and should not be amnestied. Any democrat must be repugnant at the general pardons and amnesties in a consolidated democracy. Another issue is a process of transition from dictatorship to democracy, as was experienced after Franco' s death. We are witnessing a process of constitutional change that joins the strategy of assault of the institutions, perpetrated by Sanchismo and its leaps.
4:00 It is the process that German jurists called the constitutional substitution during the Republic of beimar a rule of inferior rank, as it is a law that proceeds to modify the Constitution and the powers that fall to the Courts. Amnesty is a measure that affects a few people and becomes a unique law in which the aggressors, without having any basis, rose up against the Constitution and the statute of autonomy of Catalonia, in the context of a full democracy and with a level of autonomy that is among the highest in the world, decided to pass laws of disconnection and celebrate an illegal referendum hum. Therefore, there is not a lawful motive, such as a transition, but an artificial conflict based on lies that Sanchez buys to follow power. Above all, it is a political irresponsibility pervaded by a President of the Government who grants a general pardon that we can call absolute impunity. Therefore, Sánchez has imposed that the political powers do what I do for what they are not fighting for, has undermined the principles of legal certainty, equality and proportionality by means of a fraud of law such as an amnesty whose sole purpose is to obtain power. He has invented a right that did not exist with an arbitrary measure, such as impunity granted by an end- point law. The only beneficiaries of the amnesty are puis demon yunqueras, who have shown that Spanish democracy is a puppet at their service. Socialists are not being loyal to Spain or its party, but to Sanchez and his personal interests. It is no path to reconciliation. Do not advance in harmony
5:32 and coexistence, but in lies. It does not make democracy in Spain stronger. But Sanchez would have to assume the consequences of his behavior, because his immunity is not impunity and has expiration date