La amnistía como mutación constitucional

0:08 Amnesty as a constitutional mutation. It is true that Sanchismo does not have good jurists in its ranks. Those who have tried to defend Amnesty' s aberration have done so with simple arguments and little work. That' s what happens when you try to justify the unjustifiable. I am looking forward to reading the sentence that will eventually be drawn up by candid condefumpido to defend the constitutionality of a rule that produces a clear and unequivocal constitutional change. The Congress assumes powers that do not correspond to it and is the exercise of a right of grace that was ruled out by the constituent in the final stage of his professional career. Condepunt is willing to stain his robe to limits that he would never have imagined in a Supreme Court magistrate. I hope that Sanchez will reward his fidelity to the height of an ignominy of these dimensions. Carl Smith was Prussian Minister of Justice, something that will always be a heavy slab in his career, but does not prevent him from recognizing that his books are of extraordinary quality and depth. This is something that we cannot say about the President of the Constitutional Council If he finally decides to serve Sanchismo rather than the law, he cannot expect institutional loyalty from French- speaking Mengol who is also equal to saying one thing and the opposite. The constitutionality responds only to an order from Sánchez that contradicts what he said a few months ago. The truth does not matter but in villaming before the eight votes of pus de mont that allow him to be President of the Government. The response that faithful Fernando Galindo, who has become

1:40 the socialist Secretary General of all the deputies and senior counsel of the Sanchismo, will have neither rigor nor offer any legal guarantee. Armingón is indifferent to what he is told, because he only cares about remaining President of Congress and serving his lord. Therefore, it is now appropriate for Amnesty to be constituted instead, Galindo will remain a lawyer, except that the weight he includes on the electoral lists, although with the discredit of having placed the institution in the service of power. It is impressive that he will accept a constitutional change and I am afraid that he will also sign a report in favour of a reference to self- determination or the opposite, as appropriate for those in control of the House.