El sanchismo o la propaganda como forma de gobierno

0:09 Sanchism or propaganda as a form of government, a high office of the communist socialist coalition government. He told me that they got up every morning in the Moncloa without a plan or strategy beyond Sanchez' s will to stay in office, that is, every day he has his eagerness. The definition of this saying, which states that we should not be burdened with what happens tomorrow or in the near future, is still being put together, because it is enough to face the difficulties of every day of recognizing that I understand, apart from any ethical or moral consideration, that I do not want to leave the Presidency, because it is the best destiny for a professional politician. The alternative of retirement and thickening the list of Chinese vases is not something that seduces them.

0:51 Now we have the realization that he never thought of resigning and that the five days of April was another gesture of propaganda faltered by his hosts and the media fond of Sanchismo. Therefore, the future is always uncertain, but even more so in the hands of a populist leader who is characterized by being unpredictable and displaying amazing changes of opinion that are unparalleled in our recent history. The fundamental basis of Sanchismo is its absence of an ideology, as well as the continued use of propaganda as a form of government. Throughout history, many thinkers have raised the forms of government. To recognize my weakness for the classics, although you have to put them in the context of their time and the experiences they lived. We have all studied Plato and Aristotle with the idealized Athenian democracy or the system of balance of power that emerged in Rome, with all the nuances that we want, with the fall of the monarchy and the end of the Republic, with the Principality of August. The idea of limiting power is as old as necessary. Brass proposes five forms of government that represent a progressive degeneration of justice and the common good. Aristocracy, timocracy or ligarchy. Democracy and tyranny. Its n r s r TE of Aristotle offers a different classification, based on the number of people who govern and whether they do so for the common good or for their own interests. Monarchy, tyrant Aristocracy, ligarchy, polytheia or Republic and democracy. Plato' s vision is pessimistic and seeks an unfeasible idealism, except in theory, while Aristotle is more pragmatic and assumes that

2:21 forms of government can degenerate, so politics, the government of many for the common good, leads to a more balanced and just system. The Romans resolved in the dilemma by adapting the Republic with social struggles, to a system of balance of powers so that no one could become a tyrant. I am not going to go into the doubts about what really happened during the monarchy and last king tar than the proud, but the system worked until civil wars. Despite this, the Roman Empire survived several centuries under the rule of the emperors, the formulation of the theory and the separation of powers that it does initially what and then consecratedly what is currently in danger in Spain because of the Sanchismo and its political and media allies. It is not a trivial question because Sánchez has decided to govern for his own benefit and a political caste that joins his positions without an attism of criticism or self- criticism. The most powerful instrument in their survival strategy is propaganda. Amnesty is an example of the dangerous drift of Spanish democracy. To this must be added the client policies, the search for confrontation and radicalization, the assault of the administration and the stigmatization of the adversary.

3:29 The decision made after the spiritual retreat of the five days of April, to attack, point out and pressure judges, journalists and businessmen is a symptom that it wants to end the counter- powers that are the foundation of any democracy. Of course, masked, as we have seen throughout history, with regenerationist projects. The disturbing reality is that weight does not exist and has been transformed into sanchism, where one commands and the rest obeys. Although there is a polytburo or Sanhedrin surrounding the charismatic leader. The reaction to the discredited gift of Amnesty is the realization of this situation, but also the erratic foreign policy or scandalous regenerationist plan that no one has called for, except for the mariaches of Sanchismo. Years ago I asked an Argentine former president what Peronism was, because I was surprised by the ideological variety of its currents. He replied that it was enough to say that you were and to embrace the common and objective power. He explained to me that one day he was visited by a politician who wanted to be a Peronist and so he was appointed a judge of the Supreme Court. He replied that it was very simple. You have to convince yourself that you are. When you get out of my house, you tell the doorman you' re a Peronist, you do the same thing with your driver and when you get home with your wife. That' s enough for you to be such a saintly man. It' s the same thing.

4:44 Those who betrayed him and wanted to destroy them are his most faithful defenders. They have not had to do anything but embrace the government of one in order to benefit from the effects of a power that wants neither limits nor counterweights. It is good to remind you that the Soviet Union promoted the model of popular fronts in Europe with the aim of ending the rule of law and the separation of powers. I' d like Sanchez to be the liberal socialist I knew again.