¿El PP tiene que ceder ante Sánchez?
A estas alturas nadie puede ser tan ingenuo para no saber cómo se las gasta Sánchez. Ha demostrado que es un político implacable y sin principios, ya que acepta la mentira como forma de acción política. Felipe González...
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed A estas alturas nadie puede ser tan ingenuo para no saber cómo se las gasta Sánchez. Ha demostrado que es un político implacable y sin principios, ya que acepta la mentira como forma de acción política. Felipe González acierta al calificar la amnistía de «infecta». Lo sucedido define muy bien lo que es y representa el sanchismo. La reacción airada por los problemas judiciales que afectan a su familia ha conducido a la pretensión de imponer una agenda de reformas para controlar a los jueces y amordazar a la prensa. Es la expresión de una inquietante deriva autoritaria. Es cierto que cuenta con el aplauso de personajes menores como Pérez Royo, Urías o Martín Pallín, pero la realidad es que la inmensa mayoría de juristas, tanto del mundo académico como de la magistratura y la fiscalía, están en contra de su ofensiva contra el Estado de Derecho y la separación de poderes. Ni la jefatura del Estado ni el PP, que es el partido más importante de España, reaccionaron ante los problemas judiciales de la forma que ha hecho Sánchez.
0:08 The PPE has to give in to Sanchez. At this point, no one can be so naive as not to know how they spend them. Sánchez has shown that he is an implacable politician without principles, as he accepts lies as a form of political action. Felipe González Acierta, describing the amnesty as infecting, what happened, defines very well what is and represents Sanchismo. The angry reaction to the judicial problems affecting his family has led to the attempt to impose a reform agenda to control judges and gag the press. It is the expression of a disturbing authoritarian drift that he cannot deny. I feel that he has the applause of minor characters such as Pérez Royo UrÃas or MartÃn PallÃn, but the reality is that the vast majority of jurists, both the academic world and the judiciary and the prosecution, are against the offensive against the rule of law and the separation of powers. It is good to remember that neither the head of the state nor the pp that is the most important party in Spain, reacted to the way Sanchez has done to the judicial problems that affect both him and the PSOE. What is happening with the Constitutional Court in the hands of condepunt confirms that Feijo cannot and should not surrender to Sanchez in something as fundamental to the defense of democracy as the independence of the judiciary. The moment I manage to control it, we will see how all the causes that affect it are closed and act relentlessly and anti- legally against its enemies, how they have done the sewers of the state against yusu and his partner. For this
1:38 reason, the opposition has to be just as relentless as the one that led the pesodio against Rajo. There, we cannot agree on a composition of the Council of the Judiciary that would allow us to replicate the model of a constitutional become an instrument of Sanchismo to launder all its abuses against the Constitution and the rule of law. The sentence on the beings the best answer to the warmness of some leaders of the PP who would feel comfortable exercising as palangaros of the Moncloa. All the institutions he controls are at the service of a radical left - wing populism inspired by the Ibero- American model of Christinarism, Sandinismo and Castroism. That' s what he wants fixed for Spain.