¿Criticar a Sánchez es atacar la democracia?
Por supuesto que no. La izquierda política y mediática no puede soportar que https://www.larazon.es/tags/javier-milei/?|||EXTERNO. Era el fin del régimen corrupto de los Kirchner, pero además abría una nueva etapa para recuperar la economía de un país...
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed Por supuesto que no. La izquierda política y mediática no puede soportar que Milei derrotara al peronismo. Era el fin del régimen corrupto de los Kirchner, pero además abría una nueva etapa para recuperar la economía de un país hermano con el que nos unen lazos tan sólidos como profundos. Desde entonces, recibió críticas, insultos y desplantes. A Sánchez y sus aliados les gustan los regímenes populistas y corruptos iberoamericanos. El disparate llegó al extremo de que el bocazas oficial del Gobierno, Óscar Puente, aseguró que Milei consumía drogas. Los permanentes exabruptos del estrafalario ministro muestran una incontinencia verbal insólita y le descalifican para el cargo. Me he preguntado muchas veces por qué se denigra actuando como mamporrero. No se respeta a sí mismo. Milei hizo unas declaraciones muy inoportunas, aunque luego se confirmó que, efectivamente, la mujer del presidente estaba siendo investigada por tráfico de influencias y corrupción. Hay que respetar la presunción de inocencia, aunque los sanchistas y sus medios de comunicación no lo hagan. No hay que actuar como Puente.
0:08 To criticize Sanchez is to attack democracy, of course not the political and media left. He can' t stand my law defeating Peronism. It was the end of the corrupt Kishner regime, but there would also be a new stage in recovering the economy of a sister country with which we are linked as solid as it is deep. Since then, he has received criticism, insults and insults from Sanchez and his allies, who like populist and corrupt Ibero- American regimes. The nonsense reached the point that the bocáz is official of the scaly government assured that my law was consuming drugs. The Minister' s ex- abrupt permanents show unusual verbal incontinence and disqualify him for office. I' ve wondered many times why you' re denigrating yourself as a sucker. He doesn ' t respect himself. I made some very inopportune statements, although it was later confirmed that the President' s wife was indeed being investigated for influence trafficking and corruption. The presumption of innocence must be respected, even if the anchists and their media do not. You don' t have to act like a bridge. The Argentine President begins a private visit to Spain this Friday. There is correct use in granting him the International Medal of Madrid. As expected, the Sanchist hosts have attacked her and even claim that she is in breach of the law for not reporting on this award. Instead of criticizing Sanchez for organizing an unpresentable diplomatic crisis, they have decided to accuse her of being disloyal for not submitting to the eccentric whims of the Moncloa tenant. I don' t
1:42 understand where disloyalty is. In any case, the most incredible thing is that Miley' s criticisms, constantly insulted by Sánchez, his ministers and the media terminals controlled by the Monclovita propaganda apparatus, have turned them into an attack on Spanish democracy and its institutions. I remember Miley responding to the disqualifications of the Anchists saying that Argentina and its institutions were being attacked. Sánchez does not embody Spanish democracy, although the words of the Argentine President were inadequate, despite suffering permanent and brutal attacks. The two behaviours are unacceptable, but we cannot accept that the President of the Government appropriates the institutions and that our country' s foreign policy is subject to its partisan whims and interests. We can' t accept the smokescreens that seek to hide their problems.