Con Israel o contra Israel
No hay un término medio, porque la equidistancia es cobardía y favorecer a los criminales del grupo Hamás. Es apoyar a la dictadura teocrática de Irán en su odio contra el pueblo de...
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed No hay un término medio, porque la equidistancia es cobardía y favorecer a los criminales del grupo Hamás. Es apoyar a la dictadura teocrática de Irán en su odio contra el pueblo de Israel. Hay un agredido que es Israel y un agresor que son los terroristas palestinos y sus aliados. El primero es una democracia impecable mientras que los otros son defensores de modelos totalitarios y nunca han respetado los derechos humanos. Todos queremos la paz, excepto Hamás y los países que le apoyan como Rusia o Irán. El empalagoso e inconsistente buenismo sanchista se sitúa, una vez más, en el lado equivocado de la Historia. Es cierto que su simpatía está con los regímenes autoritarios y los populismos comunistas de Iberoamérica, pero su descarada antipatía hacia Israel es inquietante. Una vez más se esconde, como hace Borrell, en un apoyo a la paz que significa estar del lado palestino. El antisemitismo militante ha sido algo muy habitual, desgraciadamente, en la Historia de España. En el caso de la izquierda es, todavía, más descarado. No hay más que escuchar las palabras de su socia Yolanda Díaz.
0:08 With Israel or against Israel. There is no middle ground, because equidistance is cowardice and favoring the criminals of the group is never supporting Iran' s theocratic dictatorship. In their hatred of the people of Israel, there is an attacker who is Israel and an aggressor who are Palestinian terrorists and their allies. The first is an impeccable democracy, while the others are advocates of totalitarian models and have never respected human rights. We all want peace, except for Never and the countries that support it, such as Russia or Iran. The empathetic and inconsistent good Sanchistism is once again on the wrong side of history. It is true that his sympathy is with the totalitarian regimes and communist populisms of Ibero- America, but his blatant antipathy towards Israel is disturbing. Once again, he hides himself, as Borrey does, in support of peace, which means being on the Palestinian side. Militant anti- Semitism has unfortunately been very common in the history of Spain. In the case of the left it is even more brazen. Just listen to the words of your partner and Holland Diaz. Iran ' s brutal attack with two hundred dollars invisible was a huge failure thanks to the effectiveness of the Israeli defense. It is a mistake and a show of ignorance to believe that it was the result expected by the Ayatollahs, the cowards, European leaders and Baiden, who already demonstrated it with their departure from Afghanistan.
1:33 They are in this equidistance of condemning the attack, but to ask for a diplomatic response that can only provoke laughter in the Iranian regime. The war in Ukraine unfortunately confirmed the weakness of the United States the other in the European Union. At this point, it is evident that Ukrainian defeat and the victory of putting something that was more than predictable. The Russian autocrat has by chance had ironically said the invaluable help of never, which is sponsored and controlled by the Iranians. Palestinian terrorists are born nothing without their authorization. Therefore, turning your back on Israel, as Sanchez wants, recognizing a Palestinian state that would be dominated by corruption, hatred and criminal networks, is helping Putin and totalitarian regimes in the region. The only solution is to support democracy and help end never