Aragonès menosprecia a Sánchez
l debate celebrado ayer en el Senado sobre la amnistía sirvió para que el presidente del gobierno catalán, Pere Aragonès, ninguneara a Sánchez poniendo de manifiesto sus mentiras e incoherencias. Los cambios de opinión del líder socialista son...
l debate celebrado ayer en el Senado sobre la amnistía sirvió para que el presidente del gobierno catalán, Pere Aragonès, ninguneara a Sánchez poniendo de manifiesto sus mentiras e incoherencias. Los cambios de opinión del líder socialista son acogidos con desprecio por uno de sus socios preferentes, porque «a pesar de las manifestaciones, todos sabemos que la amnistía de un día para otro ha dejado de ser inconstitucional e imposible. Como pasará más tarde o más temprano con el referéndum». Es un político con una fiabilidad nula. La famosa frase «estos son mis principios, pero si no le gustan tengo otros», atribuida a Groucho Marx, es el resumen de su vacuo pensamiento político.
1
00:00:08.480 --> 00:00:14.880
Aragonese despises Sanchez. Yesterday' s
debate in the Senate on Amnesty helped the
2
00:00:14.919 --> 00:00:19.120
President of the Catalan, but Aragonese, government to ignore Sánchez, revealing his
3
00:00:19.199 --> 00:00:25.800
lies and inconsistencies. The changes of
opinion of the socialist leader are welcomed with
4
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:30.399
contempt by one of his preferred partners, because, despite the demonstrations, we
5
00:00:30.519 --> 00:00:33.840
all know that Amnesty overnight has ceased
to be unconstitutional and impossible, as will
6
00:00:33.880 --> 00:00:41.799
happen sooner or later with the referendum. He is a politician with no reliability,
7
00:00:42.039 --> 00:00:45.679
the famous phrase. These are my
principles, but if you don'
8
00:00:45.679 --> 00:00:48.880
t like them, I have others. Attributed to Groucho Mars It is the
9
00:00:48.880 --> 00:00:53.679
summary of his guaco political thought has
gone from liberal social to socialist, radical
10
00:00:53.719 --> 00:00:57.560
and populist. In a very short
time Fidel Castro reminds me. One day
11
00:00:57.679 --> 00:01:00.600
I asked my good friend, Commander
Rolando Pobo, one of the leaders of
12
00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:04.560
the Revolutionary Directory, if Castro was
a first- minute communist. He replied
13
00:01:04.599 --> 00:01:08.200
that he was raul, while Fidel
was an opportunist who had embraced him out
14
00:01:08.239 --> 00:01:12.400
of interest. After the triumph of
the Revolution, Sanchez talks about reconciliation and
15
00:01:12.439 --> 00:01:18.400
harmony with the sole objective of staying
in the Aragonese Moncloa. It' s
16
00:01:18.519 --> 00:01:21.079
overshadowed by the irruption of Demon'
s puzzle. Everything indicates that the list
17
00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:26.079
of former presidents with good pensions and
official office will be enlarged. At least
18
00:01:26.079 --> 00:01:29.959
he managed to overshadow his Franco grandfather, who only managed to be mayor of
19
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:34.439
his town, although he did good
business and enjoyed great connections with the regime.
20
00:01:34.040 --> 00:01:38.879
The debate in the Senate shows that
it is a monumental nonsense to boost
21
00:01:38.959 --> 00:01:44.840
an Amnesty with widespread political and social
rejection. It is a unique case in
22
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:49.799
European democracies, because such an initiative, apart from the debate on its constitutionality,
23
00:01:49.040 --> 00:01:55.640
requires broad consensus. On the other
hand, the behaviour of the Government
24
00:01:55.760 --> 00:01:59.680
and the weight of contempt for the
Senate is shameful, as it also shows
25
00:01:59.840 --> 00:02:02.719
a worrying ignorance of the role conferred
on it by the Constitution. The document
26
00:02:02.719 --> 00:02:07.840
that was adopted is not from the
PP but from the lawyers of the Courts
27
00:02:07.879 --> 00:02:10.479
attached to this House. What is
most disturbing is that Aragonese reconfirmed that the
28
00:02:10.560 --> 00:02:15.479
referendum will come after Amnesty. Is
that a great argument not to vote for her?
